Praticien Hospitalier – Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique
Ancien interne Médaille d’Or des Hôpitaux de Nice
Diplômes
Doctorat en Sciences: (Laboratoire Inserm U1101)
– Chirurgie de Prothèse d’Epaule assistée par Ordinateur
– Intelligence Artificielle en Chirurgie Orthopédique
Doctorat en Chirurgie : Résultat des prothèses totales inversées d’épaule associées au transfert musculo tendineux selon L’Episcopo modifié
DES de Chirurgie Générale : Prothèse totale d’épaule anatomique chez le patient jeune
Master 2 d’Ingénierie BioMédicale et Biomécanique, Ecole des Arts et Métiers, Paris, 2015 : Résultats cliniques de l’utilisation des guides patients spécifique dans la pose des prothèses totales d’épaule anatomiques
DIU de Pathologie Locomotrice liée à la pratique du Sport
DIU de Chirurgie du Genou
DIU d’Arthroscopie
DIU de Microchirurgie
DIU de Chirurgie de la Main
Spécialisation chirurgicale
Chirurgie de l’Epaule : Prothèse d’épaule, Instabilité de l’épaule (Arthroscopie), Coiffe des rotateurs
Chirurgie du Coude
Chirurgie de la Main (Droit au Titre), Chirurgie nerveuse, des Paralysies et Microchirurgie
Traumatologie générale
Prix et distinction
Lauréat de l’Université Côte d’Azur
Prix de l’Académie Nationale de Chirurgie (Chirurgie de l’Epaule patient-spécifique assistée par Ordinateur)
Médaille du Collège de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique
Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is defined by dynamic, recurrent and symptomatic partial or total loss of posterior joint contact. Anatomic risk factors comprise ligament hyperlaxity, glenoid retroversion or dysplasia, and high horizontal acromial morphology. Associated anatomic lesions comprise labrum lesions, posterior glenoid erosion and/or fracture, and anterior humeral head notching. We distinguish two subcategories of PSI: functional and structural, respectively without and with anatomic lesions. In both categories, there may be anatomic risk factors. Clinically, functional PSI involves reproducible asymptomatic voluntary subluxation or sometimes reproducible involuntary subluxation. Functional PSI implicates impaired external-rotation rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer muscle activity. Treatment is non-operative, by rehabilitation and shoulder pace maker. Structural shoulder instability involves anatomic lesions, often due to iterative microtrauma; pain is the most frequent symptom. It usually concerns young athletic subjects, but the clinical forms of structural and of anterior shoulder instability are not superimposable. Treatment may be surgical; arthroscopic labrum repair is effective in the absence of significant bone lesions, whereas otherwise posterior bone block is the treatment of choice. Surgical treatment of scapular features underlying structural PSI is improved by 3D preoperative planning, cutting guides and dedicated internal fixation systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: expert opinion.
Background: We aim to analyze recurrence of dislocation after Latarjet bone block with or without Hill-Sachs Remplissage (HSR) to specify the indication of a combined procedure.
Methods: We analyzed 118 patients with a bipolar lesions and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. All procedures were performed arthroscopically by 3 surgeons in on center. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were collected. We also collected preoperative and postoperative clinical scores Two groups were identified: 30 patients with arthroscopic Latarjet bone block combined with a HSR (group I) and 88 patients with an isolated Latarjet (group II). Measurements were performed on a reformatted shoulder CT-scan. On preoperative CT-scans, we measured the glenoid bone loss, the width and the length of the humeral lesion then the glenoid track and Hill-Sachs interval.
Results: The mean follow-up is 6 years. Five dislocations occurred in group II, none in group I. The area of glenoid bone loss was higher in group I than in group II (33.4% ± 4.5% vs. 20.5% ± 8.9%, P = .001). Twenty shoulders presented an Off-Track lesion preoperatively that was always compensated postoperatively by the bone block in group I. No cutoff was found to be discriminating enough to help in the decision-making process. All recurrences had an Instability Severity Index score > 6.
Conclusion: No recurrence occurred in Group I. However, 5 patients (6%) in Group II experienced a recurrent dislocation with no significant difference. Glenoid track is not an isolated argument to indicate an isolated bone block procedure or a combined HSR. The risk of recurrence increases in patients with an Instability Severity Index score over 6 and in this case, a combine procedure should be recommended.
Preoperative CT measurements of distal radial inclination and volar tilt are useful for surgical planning, but current methods are time-consuming and user-dependent. This study validates an automated 3D measurement method for these measurements. We analysed 20 bilateral CT scans, including healthy and pathological sides with extra-articular malunions. Three senior observers performed manual measurements and an automated algorithm generated measurements based on the radiocarpal surface. Agreement between manual and automatic methods was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis, with acceptable agreement set at 5° for the coefficient of repeatability. Correction quantification accuracy was assessed by comparing each method to a reference method. The mean difference in radial inclination between the automatic and manual methods was -6° and for volar tilt was -2.6°. The automated method showed closer correction agreement with the reference, enhancing reproducibility and saving time in preoperative planning.Level of evidence: III.
Background: There are some major controversies surrounding the use and longevity of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA). The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term survival and outcomes (minimum 10-year) following PISA for osteoarthritis (OA) in young and active patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent PISA (InSpyre; Tornier-Stryker) for OA between 2009 and 2012. Arthroplasty survival was known for 71 patients followed longitudinally for a minimum of 10 years. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed in 62 patients (62 shoulders) reviewed with radiographs. The mean age at surgery was 60 years (range, 23-72 years), and 31 shoulders (50%) underwent prior surgery before PISA. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (POA = 29), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA = 23), and postinstability osterarthritis (PIOA = 10). Clinical failure was defined as repeat surgical intervention involving prosthesis revision. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The mean duration of follow-up was 11 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-14 years).
Results: Overall, the survival rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.8-96.8) at 5 years and 87% (95% CI 79-94.8) at a 10-year follow-up. Survival was 100% in PTOA (type 1 fracture sequelae) and in PIOA as well as 95% in primary OA with type A glenoid. Revision surgery was significantly higher in biconcave (type B2) glenoid (44%) compared with concentric (type A) glenoid (2%), respectively (P = .002). Among the 7 patients who were revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 5 had painful glenoid erosion and 2 had bipolar (glenoid and humeral) erosion with thinning and finally fracture of the greater tuberosity. Two shoulders with glenohumeral erosion were associated with secondary rotator cuff tears (1 supraspinatus and 1 subscapularis tear). The mean time to revision and revision was 4 ± 1.7 years. Glenoid wear was more often superior (81%) than central (19%), P < .001. For those shoulders not revised, the mean CS and SSV significantly increased from 39 ± 14 to 70 ± 14 points and 34% ± 15% to 75% ± 17%, respectively (P < .001).
Conclusion: PISA is an efficient and durable surgical procedure for the treatment of young and active patients with post-traumatic OA, postinstability OA, and primary OA with concentric (type A) glenoid erosion, but not for those with biconcave (type B2) glenoid. Biconcave (type B2) glenoid and subscapularis tear or insufficiency are risk factors for failure and revision.
Hypothesis: Chronic epilepsy may cause important bipolar bony lesions. We aim to compare the specific pathoanatomic metrics of the bony lesions in chronic shoulder anterior instability that occur in patients with epilepsy vs. patients without epilepsy.
Methods: From 2006 to 2020, we included epileptic and nonepileptic patients with anterior recurrent shoulder instability. We randomly adjusted the patients of the 2 groups according to the sex, age, and type of management. We included 50 patients. For each included patient, we performed an in-depth analysis and comparison of the glenoid bone loss based on the computed tomography scan: PICO method (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) using the best-fit circle; and the Hill-Sachs lesion: the depth and width were given as a percentage of the humeral head diameter on an axial view. We also evaluated the engaging character of the involved lesion using the on-track vs. off-track analysis. Those characteristics were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: We found a glenoid bone loss in 32 patients. Glenoid bone loss was not significantly greater in patients with epilepsy (P = .052). A Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 42 patients (22 in the group with epilepsy and 20 in the group without epilepsy). Hill-Sachs lesions were significantly deeper and larger in the group with epilepsy (depth: 22% vs. 9%, P < .001; width: 43% vs. 28%, P = .003). In the group with epilepsy, 90% of the bone lesions were off-track vs. 30% in the group without epilepsy. Thus, the patients with epilepsy presented more engaging bony lesions than patients without epilepsy (P = .001) (OR = 23).
Conclusions: In a population of patients with epilepsy who had shoulder instability, Hill-Sachs lesions are larger and deeper than in normal patients with shoulder instability. By contrast, there is no significant difference regarding the characteristics of the glenoid bone loss if present. This implies that bone lesions in instable shoulders of patients with epilepsy need at least a bony stabilization procedure on the humeral side in the majority of cases.
Keywords: Hill-Sachs, shoulder stabilization; Shoulder; anterior instability; bone lesion; epilepsy.
Background: Several studies have demonstrated the interest in patient-specific custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but clinical improvement remains debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes (Forgotten Joint Score, FJS) of patients undergoing individualized TKA compared with those receiving off-the-shelf (OTS) implants, both using patient-specific cutting guides with personalized alignment over a minimum follow up period of 12 months. We hypothesized that individualized TKA demonstrates significantly better functional outcomes than OTS TKA (FJS and percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference).
Methods: A continuous single-surgeon retrospective series was analyzed from September 2018 to June 2020. The inclusion criterion was primary TKA for osteoarthritis. The series compared 58 individualized TKAs to 54 standard implants, with personalized alignment, at a mean follow up of 25 (12-40) months. The two groups were comparable in gender, age, BMI, and preoperative deformity. Complications and revision procedures were recorded. The FJS, New IKS, and Oxford Knee Score were assessed at the last follow up, and the sensation of a forgotten knee was evaluated.
Results: One patient in each group required TKA revision. At last follow up, the individualized TKA group showed significantly better FJS (91 ± 14 vs. 81 ± 23, P = 0.01), satisfaction category in the IKS (36 ± 5 vs. 32 ± 8, P = 0.002), IKS function (83 ± 11 vs. 72 ± 21, P = 0.003) and Oxford scores (44 ± 5 vs. 39 ± 10, P = 0.005. There was no significant difference in the IKS objective score (88 ± 16 vs. 82 ± 2, P = 0.34). The sensation of a forgotten knee rate did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion: Individualized TKA leads to improved clinical outcomes significantly compared with OTS TKA, utilizing personalized alignment and patient-specific cutting guides. This combination of personalized factors and individualized TKA enhances the potential to tackle the challenges associated with TKA and improve functional results.
Keywords: Custom TKA; Off-the-shelf TKA; Personalized alignment; Total knee arthroplasty.
Background: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) calculation in patients with shoulder instability has a wide variability in methods and their reliability. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate a new semi-automated software developed to improve GBL calculation using a 3D imaging modeling (IODA-shoulder) and to compare the method to the PICO area method.
Patients and methods: A semi-automated software to assess GBL was preliminarily developed and validated on 7 fresh frozen specimens (scapulae with artificially created glenoid defect), using water displacement method. Afterwards, the software was retrospectively used on CT images of 20 patients affected by recurrent shoulder dislocation. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral dislocation, minimum 2 dislocation episodes. Exclusion criteria were bone reconstruction of the glenoid, failed shoulder stabilization, bilateral dislocation, shoulder arthritis. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of bilateral shoulder were retrieved for each patient. Two methods to determine GBL were compared. The PICO surface area method and the new IODA method. We assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the two methods with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Bland-Alman analysis, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).
Results: We did not find a statistically significant difference between the mean volumes calculated with PICO and IODA methods, respectively 914 vs. 815 mm3, p=0.155. The analysis carried out by using the traditional PICO method showed a lower concordance rate among four observers than the higher concordance found using IODA method, regardless of the size and the location of the defect. The ICC agreement with PICO was significantly lower than with IODA (0.76 vs. 0.97). We found a poor CCC with PICO (from 0.65 to 0.81) and a substantial one with IODA (from 0.96 to 0.98).
Discussion: The intra- and inter-rater reliability using IODA method is significantly better than PICO method. The assessment of GBL using IODA method is time saving, avoiding significant inter- and intra-observer variation, mainly due to individual skill and experience in the method.
Level of evidence: IV, experimental study.
Keywords: CT scan; Glenoid bone loss; Instability; Shoulder.
Background: The aim of this study was to define the variability of the scapulohumeral position during preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) acquisition and to evaluate its influence on angular lateralization and distalization measurements. We hypothesized that the preoperative resting arm position, in terms of humeral abduction, flexion and internal rotation, would vary significantly between patients and that this variability would influence the lateralization (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA).
Methods: We analyzed a prospectively collected database of preoperative de-identified CT scans from a single Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) planning system (Equinoxe, Exactech GPS, Blue-Ortho), including all cases with scapular and humeral segmentation. Validated three-dimensional (3D) bone models were used to compute and automatically position scapular and humeral landmarks. These included: the superior glenoid tubercle; the most lateral border of the acromion and the most lateral border of the greater tuberosity. The position of the humerus relative to the scapula was automatically calculated, allowing the angles of abduction, flexion and internal rotation of the scapulohumeral joint to be assessed. Additionally, the potential relationship between the body mass index (BMI) and the resting arm position was assessed. Finally, LSA and DSA were calculated. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the humeral position and the LSA and DSA.
Results: A total of 21,863 patients were included. Preoperative humeral positioning relative to the scapula showed a mean abduction of 10.3°±12.4 (-14.0°; 36.6°), mean flexion of 3.9°±8.9 (-16.0°; 26.1°) and mean internal rotation of 6.5°±18.9 (-41.4°; 48.9°). The preoperative median of LSA and DSA were 87.4°±14.3° and 43°±12.4, respectively. Among the independent variables, abduction showed the strongest negative correlation with LSA (β = -0.2998, p < 0.0001), followed by flexion (β = -0.04342, p < 0.0001). Internal rotation was positively correlated with LSA (β = 0.1229, p < 0.0001). For DSA, abduction had a weak positive influence (β = 0.04321, p < 0.0001), while flexion (β = -0.04302, p < 0.0001) and internal rotation (β = -0.04654, p < 0.0001) were negatively associated. Notably, a 10° variation in abduction, flexion or internal rotation led to a -3°, -0.4° and + 1.2° change in LSA, respectively, whereas DSA was minimally affected, with variations limited to + 0.4°, -0.4° and – 0.5°, respectively.
Conclusion: The resting arm position during preoperative CT scans varies significantly, potentially affecting the preoperative planning of TSA. The main findings of this study suggest that there exists a weak correlation between the initial scapulohumeral position and the LSA/DSA measurements.
Level of evidence: Level IV. Case series with no comparison group.
Keywords: Distalization shoulder angle; Lateralization shoulder angle; Planning software; Resting arm position; Scapulohumeral relative position; Shoulder arthritis; Total shoulder arthroplasty.
Introduction: Internal rotation with the elbow against the body (IR1) is a crucial functional range of motion of the shoulder for daily activities. Its restoration following prosthetic surgery, particularly after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, remains unsatisfactory and unresolved. In clinical practice, its assessment can be challenging and subject to variability depending on the examiner. One method for evaluating IR range of motion is to determine the highest vertebral level reached by the patient. The objective of this study was to analyze interobserver agreement for the assessment of internal rotation using this commonly employed method, which is also utilized in the calculation of the Constant score.
Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that IR1 measurement based on the highest vertebral level reached would demonstrate a high degree of interobserver agreement.
Materials and methods: A total of 285 photographs of healthy volunteers performing a IR1 movement, as instructed prior to image acquisition, were independently and blindly assessed by four experienced shoulder surgeons. The range of motion was classified into six levels: thigh, buttocks, lumbosacral junction, waist (L3), T12 vertebra, and interscapular region (T7). Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa, while pairwise agreement between raters was calculated using Cohen’s kappa.
Results: Overall interobserver agreement was strong (K = 0.7, p-value < 0.04). In the paired analysis using Cohen’s kappa, interobserver agreement was almost perfect between certain raters, with values reaching up to 0.89. Detailed kappa analysis showed almost perfect agreement for the IR1 levels corresponding to the thigh and the interscapular region (K = 0.91 and 0.85, respectively). Agreement was strong for the buttocks level (K = 0.66) and moderate for the intermediate levels (T12, L3, and the lumbosacral junction) with K values of 0.57, 0.47, and 0.53, respectively.
Discussion: The interobserver correlation for this method of assessing IR1 range of motion is strong, suggesting that evaluating IR1 based on the highest vertebral level reached is a reproducible method for clinical shoulder examination.
Purpose: One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty has the advantage of requiring a single hospital stay and a single anaesthesia. The topic has been little reported, unlike one stage bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty, which have demonstrated their interest. The aim of the present study was to determine peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality after this procedure. The study hypothesis was that peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty is low in selected patients and that satisfaction is high.
Methods: A single-centre retrospective study assessed peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-one patients, aged < 80 years, with ASA score ≤ 3, were consecutively operated on between 1999 and 2020. Indications comprised primary osteoarthritis, aseptic osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis, massive rotator cuff tear, and dislocation fracture, involving both shoulders.
Results: There were no early deaths. The complication rate was 10% (4/21 cases). No prosthesis dislocation or sepsis was reported. Mean blood loss was 145 ± 40 cc, mean surgery time 164 ± 63 min, and mean hospital stay five ± four days. Only one patient required postoperative transfusion. Functional results at six months showed significantly improved range of motion and good patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty was feasible in selected patients. Mortality was zero, and morbidity was low. Surgery time was reasonable and required no repositioning. Postoperative home help is indispensable for patient satisfaction during rehabilitation.
We report here a rare case of an acute peripheral nerve compression by pseudotumoral calcinosis (PCT) at the right elbow in a patient with severe tertiary hyperaparathyroidism. This complication required urgent multidisciplinary management. Surgical decompression by PCT resection enabled rapid motor and sensory recovery.
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning is increasingly used in orthopaedic surgery. Two-dimensional (2D) characterization of distal radial deformities remains inaccurate, and 3D planning requires a reliable reference frame at the wrist. We aim to evaluate the reliability of the determination of anatomical points placed manually on 3D models of the radius to determine which of those points allow reliable morphometric measurements.
Methods: Twenty-three radial scans were reconstructed in 3D. Five operators specialized in the upper limb manually positioned 8 anatomical points on each model. One of the operators repeated the operation 6 times. The anatomical points were based on previously published 3D models used for radial inclination and dorsopalmar tilt measurements. The repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements derived using this manual landmarking were calculated using different measurement methods based on the identified points. An error of ≤2° was considered clinically acceptable.
Results: This study of intraobserver and interobserver variability of the anatomic points allowed us to determine the least variable and most accurately defined points. The middle of the ulnar border of the radius, the radial styloid, and the midpoint of the ulnar incisura of the radius were the least variable. The palmar and dorsal ends of the ridge delineating the scaphoid and lunate facets were the most variable. Only 1 of the radial inclination measurement methods was clinically acceptable; the others had a repeatability and reproducibility limit of >2°, making those measurements clinically unacceptable.
Conclusions: The use of isolated points seems insufficient for the development of a wrist reference frame, especially for the purpose of measuring dorsopalmar tilt. If one concurs that an error of 2° is unacceptable for all distal radial measurements, then clinicians should avoid using 3D landmarked points, due to their unreliability, except for radial inclination measured using the radial styloid and the midpoint of the ulnar edge of the radius. A characterization of the wrist using 3D shapes that fit the articular surface of the radius should be considered.
Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Grégoire Micicoi, Bernard de Geofroy, Julien Chamoux, Ammar Ghabi, Marc-Olivier Gauci, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez
Introduction: Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.
Hypothesis: Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.
Material and methods: This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative « hidden » blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.
Results: Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626±506mL versus PA: 1746±692mL (p=0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p=0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5±3.2 versus PA: 8.2±3.3 days (p=0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ=10.3±14.1minutes [p<0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p=0.03).
Conclusion: This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.
Level of proof: III, comparative study of continuous series.
Background: The etiology of humeral posterior subluxation remains unknown, and it has been hypothesized that horizontal muscle imbalance could cause this condition. The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of anterior-to-posterior rotator cuff and deltoid muscle volume as a function of humeral subluxation and glenoid morphology when analyzed as a continuous variable in arthritic shoulders.
Methods: In total, 333 computed tomography scans of shoulders (273 arthritic shoulders and 60 healthy controls) were included in this study and were segmented automatically. For each muscle, the volume of muscle fibers without intramuscular fat was measured. The ratio between the volume of the subscapularis and the volume of the infraspinatus plus teres minor (AP ratio) and the ratio between the anterior and posterior deltoids (APdeltoid) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether a correlation could be found between these ratios and glenoid version, humeral subluxation, and/or glenoid type per the Walch classification.
Results: Within the arthritic cohort, no statistically significant difference in the AP ratio was found between type A glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22) and type B glenoids (1.03 ± 0.16, P = .09), type D glenoids (1.12 ± 0.27, P = .77), or type C glenoids (1.10 ± 0.19, P > .999). No correlation was found between the AP ratio and glenoid version (ρ = -0.0360, P = .55) or humeral subluxation (ρ = 0.076, P = .21). The APdeltoid ratio of type A glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15) was significantly greater than that of type B glenoids (0.35 ± 0.16, P < .01) and type C glenoids (0.21 ± 0.10, P < .01) but was not significantly different from that of type D glenoids (0.64 ± 0.34, P > .999). When evaluating both healthy control and arthritic shoulders, moderate correlations were found between the APdeltoid ratio and both glenoid version (ρ = 0.55, P < .01) and humeral subluxation (ρ = -0.61, P < .01).
Conclusion: This in vitro study supports the use of software for fully automated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the 4 rotator cuff muscles and the deltoid. Compared with previous 2-dimensional computed tomography scan studies, our study did not find any correlation between the anteroposterior muscle volume ratio and glenoid parameters in arthritic shoulders. However, once deformity occurred, the observed APdeltoid ratio was lower with type B and C glenoids. These findings suggest that rotator cuff muscle imbalance may not be the precipitating etiology for the posterior humeral subluxation and secondary posterior glenoid erosion characteristic of Walch type B glenoids.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of changing humeral tray thickness on the resultant of intraoperative glenohumeral joint loads using a load-sensing system (LSS).
Methods: An rTSA was performed on fresh frozen full-body cadaver shoulders by using an internal proprietary LSS on the humeral side. The glenohumeral loads (Newtons) and the direction of the resultant force applied on the implant were recorded during four standard positions (External rotation, Extension, Abduction, Flexion) and three « complex » positions of Activity Daily Life (« behind back », « overhead reach » and « across chest »). For each position, the thickness was increased from 0 to 6 mm in a continuous fashion using the adjustment feature of the humeral system. Each manoeuvre was repeated three times.
Results: All shoulder positions showed a high repeatability of the glenohumeral load magnitude measured with an intra-class correlation coefficient of over 0.9. For each position, we observed a strong but no linear correlation between humeral tray thickness and joint loads. It was a cubical correlation (rs = 0,91) with a short ascending phase, then a plateau phase, and finally a phase with an exponential growth of the loads on the humeral implant. In addition, an increase in trail-poly thickness led to a recentering of force application at the interface of the two glenohumeral implants.
Conclusion: This study provides further insight into the effects of humeral implant thickness on rTSA glenohumeral joint loads during different positions of the arm. Data obtained using this type of device could guide surgeons in finding the proper implant balance during rTSA.
Background: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the lower limbs is a function-threatening event usually managed by extended dermofasciotomy. Closure of the skin may be delayed, creating a risk of complications when there is an underlying fracture. Early treatment at the pre-ACS stage might allow isolated fasciotomy with no skin incision. The primary objective of this study was to compare intracompartmental pressure (ICP) changes after fasciotomy and after dermofasciotomy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate potential associations linking the starting ICP to achievement of an ICP below the physiological cut-off of 10mm Hg and to determine whether the ICP changes after fasciotomy and dermofasciotomy varied across muscle compartments.
Hypothesis: Fasciotomy with no skin incision may not provide a sufficient ICP decrease, depending on the initial ICP value.
Material and methods: A previously validated model of cadaver ACS of the lower limbs was used. Saline was injected gradually to raise the ICP to>15mmHg (ICP15), >30mmHg (ICP30), and >50mmHg (ICP50). We studied 70 leg compartments (anterior, lateral, and superficial posterior) in 13 cadavers (mean age, 89.1±4.6years). ICP was monitored continuously. Percutaneous, minimally invasive fasciotomy consisting in one to three 1-cm incisions was performed in each compartment. ICP was measured before and after fasciotomy then after subsequent skin incision. The objective was to decrease the ICP below 10mmHg after fasciotomy or dermofasciotomy.
Results: Overall, mean ICP was 37.8±19.1mmHg after the injection of 184.0±133.01mL of saline. In the ICP15 group, the mean ICP of 16.1mmHg fell to 1.4mmHg after fasciotomy (ΔF=14.7) and 0.3mmHg after dermofasciotomy (ΔDF=1.1). Corresponding values in the ICP30 group were 33.9mmHg, 4.7mmHg (ΔF=29.2), and 1.2mmHg (ΔDF=3.5); and in the ICP50 group, 63.7mmHg, 17.0mmHg (ΔF=46.7), and 1.2mmHg (ΔDF=15.8). Thus, in the group with initial pressures >50mmHg, the ICP decrease was greater after both procedures, but fasciotomy alone nonetheless failed to achieve physiological values (<10mmHg). The pressure changes were not significantly associated with the compartment involved (anterior, lateral, or superficial posterior) (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, higher baseline ICPs were associated with larger ICP drops after fasciotomy and dermofasciotomy. Nevertheless, when the baseline ICP exceeded 50mmHg, fasciotomy alone failed to decrease the ICP below 10mmHg. Adding a skin incision achieved this goal.
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Marc-Olivier Gauci, Romain Ceccarelli, Vincent Lavoue, Mikael Chelli, Olivier A J van der Meijden, Jean-François Gonzalez, Pascal Boileau
Background: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with both excessive posterior humeral subluxation (PHS) and excessive glenoid retroversion in 40% of cases. These morphometric abnormalities are a particular issue because they may be responsible for a deterioration in long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a computed tomographic (CT) analysis of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with B2-, B3-, or C-type glenoids in whom an attempt was made to correct for excessive glenoid retroversion and excessive posterior humeral subluxation intraoperatively.
Material: We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 62 TSA patients with a preoperative PHS of the glenohumeral joint (31 men, 31 women, 70 ± 9 years) between January 2000 and January 2014. Glenoids were classified as B2 (32 cases), B3 (13 cases), or C (17 cases). Glenoid retroversion was corrected by anterior asymmetric reaming. Patients were reviewed for clinical and CT scan assessment with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years (minimum 5 years). At final follow-up, the CT images were reconstructed in the scapular plane. A PHS index >65% defined persistence.
Results: The revision-free rate was estimated at 93%. Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively (ρ = 0.58) and strong at final follow-up (ρ = 0.73). Postoperative CT scans on average showed a surgical correction of PHS compared to preoperatively (79% vs. 65% respectively, P < .05) and retroversion (20° vs. 10° respectively, P < .05). At final follow-up, 25 of 62 patients had a persistence in the 2-dimensional (2D) model and 41 of 62 in the corrected 2D model. Persistence of PHS had no influence on clinical outcomes but did demonstrate a significantly higher glenoid loosening rate (20% vs. 59%, P < .05).
Conclusion: Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively and strengthened at long-term follow-up. Anterior asymmetric reaming allowed for a surgical improvement of both PHS and retroversion, but it was not sufficient to maintain a correction over time. Glenoid loosening was more frequent in case of PHS persistence but seemingly without clinical relevance.
Keywords: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; B glenoid; biconcave glenoid; osteoarthritis; persistence; posterior humeral subluxation.
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) offers promising functional outcomes for young patients, yet challenges persist in restoring internal rotation (IR). This study aimed to assess the restoration of IR after RSA in patients younger than 60 years of age and analyze the factors affecting IR recovery.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, examining the functional outcome of patients who underwent RSA, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Two subgroups of patients who underwent primary RSA were analyzed separately with respect to active internal rotation with the elbow at the side (AIR1): « difficult AIR1 » and « easy AIR1. »
Results: The study included 136 patients (overall series) with a mean age of 51.6 years. The overall series showed statistically significant improvement in active range of motion (RoM), pain, and Constant scores, especially with active IR (p < 0.01). According to etiology, statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in active IR was observed for fracture sequelae, primary osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, whereas no statistically significant improvement in IR was observed for tumor, revision, and cuff-tear arthropathy (p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with easy AIR1 displayed a statistically significant lower body mass index and better Constant score mobility, as well as improved motion in forward elevation and active IR (p < 0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between improved IR and prosthetic design or subscapularis repair. Scapular notch, lysis of the graft, and teres minor atrophy were significantly associated with better active IR (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: RSA improves active RoM, pain, and functional outcomes in patients aged under 60. However, the degree of improvement in IR may vary depending on several factors and the underlying etiologies. These insights are crucial for patient selection and counseling, guiding RSA optimization efforts.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Constant score; Internal rotation; Range of motion; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Young arthritis shoulder.
Neer’s classification for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) uses 10 mm and 45° thresholds to distinguish displaced fragments. While this system was originally developed referencing 2D X-rays, fracture displacements occur in three dimensions. Our work aimed to develop a standardized and reliable computerized method for measuring PHF 3D spatial displacements. CT scans of 77 PHFs were analyzed. A statistical shape model (SSM) was used to generate the pre-fracture humerus. This predicted proximal humerus was then used as a « layer » to manually reduce fragments to their native positions and quantify translation and rotation in three dimensions. 3D computerized measurements could be calculated for 96% of fractures and revealed that 47% of PHFs were displaced according to Neer’s criteria. Valgus and varus head rotations in the coronal plane were present in 39% and 45% of cases; these were greater than 45° in 8% of cases and were always associated with axial and sagittal rotations. When compared to 3D measurements, 2D methods underestimated the displacement of tuberosity fragments and did not accurately assess rotational displacements. The use of 3D measurements of fracture displacement is feasible with a computerized method and may help further refine PHF analysis and surgical planning.
Introduction: The etiology of humeral posterior subluxation remains unknown, and it has been hypothesized that horizontal muscle imbalance could cause this condition. The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of anterior to posterior rotator cuff muscle and deltoid volumes as a function of humeral subluxation and glenoid morphology when analyzed as continuous variable in arthritic shoulders.
Methods: Three hundred and thirty-three (273 arthritic and 60 healthy controls) CT scans of shoulders were included in this study and were segmented automatically. For each muscle, the volume of muscle fibers without intra-muscular fat was then measured. The ratio between the volume of the subscapularis and the volume of the infraspinatus + teres minor (AP ratio) and the ratio between the anterior and posterior deltoid (APdeltoid) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether a correlation could be found between these ratios and glenoid version/ humeral subluxation/glenoid type in the Walch classification.
Results: Within the arthritic cohort, no statistically significant difference was found between the AP ratio between A and type B glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.03 ± 0.16 p=0.09), between A and D type glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.12 ± 0.27, p=0.77) nor between the A and C type glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.10 ± 0.19, p=1). No correlation was found between AP ratio and glenoid version/humeral subluxation (rho =-0.0360, p=0.55; rho = 0.076; p=0.21). The APdeltoid ratio of type A glenoids was significantly greater than that of type B glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.35 ± 0.16, p< 0.01), and type C glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.21±0.10, p < 0.01) but not significantly different from the APdeltoid ratio of type D glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.64 ± 0.34, p=1). When evaluating both healthy control and arthritic shoulders, moderate correlations were found between APdeltoid ratio and glenoid version/humeral subluxation (rho=0.55, p<0.01; rho=-0.61, p<0.01).
Conclusion: As opposed to previous two-dimensional CT scan studies, we did not find any correlation between AP muscle volume ratio and glenoid parameters in arthritic shoulders. Therefore, rotator cuff muscle imbalance does not seem to be associated with posterior humeral subluxation leading to posterior glenoid erosion and subsequent retroversion characteristic of Walch B glenoids. However, our results could suggest that a larger posterior deltoid pulls the humerus posteriorly into posterior subluxation, but this requires further evaluation as the deltoid follows the humerus possibly leading to secondary asymmetry between the anterior and the posterior deltoid.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze the real range of motion (RoM) measured in patients operated on for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and compare it to the virtual RoM provided by the preoperative planning software.
Hypothesis: There was a difference between virtual and real RoM, which can be explained by different factors, specifically the scapula-thoracic (ST) joint.
Methods: Twenty patients with RSA were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Passive RoM in forward elevation abduction, without and with manually locking the ST joint, and in external rotation with arm at side were recorded. The humerus, scapula, and implants were manually segmented on post-operative CTs. Post-operative bony structures were registered to preoperative bony elements. From this registration, a post-operative plan corresponding to the real post-operative implant positioning was generated and the corresponding virtual RoM analysis was recorded. On the post-operative anteroposterior X-rays and 2D-CT coronal planning view, the glenoid horizontal line angle (GH), the metaphyseal horizontal line angle (MH), and the gleno-metaphyseal angle (GMA) were measured to assess the extrinsic glenoid inclination, as well as the relative position of the humeral and glenoid components.
Results: There were some significant differences between virtual and post-operative passive abduction and forward elevation, with (55° and 50°, p < 0.0001) or without ST joint participation (15° and 27°, p < 0.002). For external rotation with arm at side, there was no significant difference between planning (24° ± 26°) and post-operative clinical observation (19° ± 12°) (p = 0.38). For the angle measurements, the GMA was significantly higher (42.8° ± 15.2° vs. 29.1°± 18.2°, p < 0.0001), and the GH angle, significantly lower on the virtual planning (85.2° ± 8.8° vs. 99.5° ± 12.5°, p < 0.0001), while the MH was not different (p = 0.33).
Conclusions: The virtual RoM given by the planning software used in this study differs from the real post-operative passive RoM, except for external rotation. This can be explained by the lack of ST joint and soft tissues simulation. However, in focusing on the virtual GH participation, the simulation looks informative. Some modifications between the glenoid and humerus starting positions before running the motion analysis could be provided for making it more realistic and predictive of the RSA functional results.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: motion analysis; preoperative planning; range of motion; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; scapulothoracic joint; soft tissues.
Close
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Marc-Olivier Gauci, Manuel Olmos, Caroline Cointat, Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas, Manuel Urvoy, Albert Murienne, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez
Purpose: Clinical evaluation of the shoulder range of motion (RoM) may vary significantly depending on the surgeon. We aim to validate an automatic shoulder RoM measurement system associating image acquisition by an RGB-D (red/green/blue-depth) video camera to an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.
Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were included. A 3D RGB-D sensor that simultaneously generated a colour image and a depth map was used. Then, an open-access convolutional neural network algorithm that was programmed for shoulder recognition provided a 3D motion measure. Each volunteer adopted a randomized position successively. For each position, two observers made a visual (EyeREF) and goniometric measurement (GonioREF), blind to the automated software which was implemented by an orthopaedic surgeon. We evaluated the inter-tester intra-class correlation (ICC) between observers and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the three methods.
Results: For manual evaluations EyeREF and GonioREF, ICC remained constantly excellent for the widest motions in the vertical plane (i.e., abduction and flexion). It was very good for ER1 and IR2 and fairly good for adduction, extension, and ER2. Differences between the measurements’ means of EyeREF and shoulder RoM was significant for all motions. Compared to GonioREF, shoulder RoM provided similar results for abduction, adduction, and flexion and EyeREF provided similar results for adduction, ER1, and ER2. The three methods showed an overall good to excellent CCC. The mean bias between the three methods remained under 10° and clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: RGB-D/AI combination is reliable in measuring shoulder RoM in consultation, compared to classic goniometry and visual observation.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automatic clinical assessment; Goniometer comparison; Markerless sensor; Range of motion; Shoulder.
Background: Glomus tumors, also known as benign acral tumors are extremely rare. Previous glomus tumors from other regions of the body have been linked to neurological compression symptoms, however axillary compression at the scapular neck has never been described.
Case presentation: Here, we report a case of axillary nerve compression in a 47-year-old man, secondary to a glomus tumor of the neck of the right scapula, initially misdiagnosed with biceps tenodesis performed and no pain improvement. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a well-contoured, 12 mm tumefaction at the inferior pole of the scapular neck T2-hyperintense and T1-isointense and interpreted as a neuroma. An axillary approach allowed the dissection of the axillary nerve, and the tumor was completely removed. The pathological anatomical analysis resulted in a nodular red lesion measuring 14 × 10 mm, delimited and encapsulated with a definitive diagnostic of glomus tumor. The neurologic symptoms and pain disappeared 3 weeks after surgery and the patient reported satisfaction with the surgical procedure. After 3 months, the results remain stable with a complete resolution of the symptoms.
Conclusions: In cases of unexplained and atypical pain in the axillary area, and to avoid potential misdiagnoses and inappropriate treatments, an in-depth exploration for a compressive tumor should be performed as a differential diagnosis.
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Purpose: Clinical evaluation of the shoulder range of motion (RoM) may vary significantly depending on the surgeon. We aim to validate an automatic shoulder RoM measurement system associating image acquisition by an RGB-D (red/green/blue-depth) video camera to an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.
Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were included. A 3D RGB-D sensor that simultaneously generated a colour image and a depth map was used. Then, an open-access convolutional neural network algorithm that was programmed for shoulder recognition provided a 3D motion measure. Each volunteer adopted a randomized position successively. For each position, two observers made a visual (EyeREF) and goniometric measurement (GonioREF), blind to the automated software which was implemented by an orthopaedic surgeon. We evaluated the inter-tester intra-class correlation (ICC) between observers and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the three methods.
Results: For manual evaluations EyeREF and GonioREF, ICC remained constantly excellent for the widest motions in the vertical plane (i.e., abduction and flexion). It was very good for ER1 and IR2 and fairly good for adduction, extension, and ER2. Differences between the measurements’ means of EyeREF and shoulder RoM was significant for all motions. Compared to GonioREF, shoulder RoM provided similar results for abduction, adduction, and flexion and EyeREF provided similar results for adduction, ER1, and ER2. The three methods showed an overall good to excellent CCC. The mean bias between the three methods remained under 10° and clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: RGB-D/AI combination is reliable in measuring shoulder RoM in consultation, compared to classic goniometry and visual observation.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automatic clinical assessment; Goniometer comparison; Markerless sensor; Range of motion; Shoulder.
Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up
Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up
Background: Various implant designs have been proposed to increase active range of motion (ROM) and avoid notching in patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an onlay prosthesis design combining a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle with the glenoid component lateralized and inferiorized.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted of the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up (≥24 months) of all RSAs performed by the same surgeon between September 2015 and December 2016 in the study center. At the last follow-up, patients were clinically assessed for ROM, Constant score, and subjective shoulder value and radiologically for scapular notching and glenoid radiolucent lines. Patients were followed up radiographically at 1 month and clinically at between 6 and 12 months (midterm) and again at between 24 and 48 months (final follow-up). Scapular notching was graded as per the Sirveaux classification at the last follow-up on anterior-posterior radiographs.
Results: Seventy-nine RSAs were included with a mean follow-up time of 31 months. The mean Constant score at the final follow-up was 42 points higher than before surgery (69 vs. 27, P < .001). There were also significant postoperative improvements in ROM (active anterior elevation, active external rotation, and active internal rotation). The final means for motions were 133° for active anterior elevation, 32° active external rotation, and level 7 for active internal rotation. The overall notching rate was 3% (2/67), and there were no cases of severe notching. Radiolucent lines were observed in 8 of 70 prostheses (11.5%) around the peg, and they were observed in 9 prostheses (13%) around the screws. Among the 79 RSAs included, there were 11 complications (13.9%) (two infections, two fractures, four cases of glenoid component loosening, and three cases of instability), 2 reoperations, and 4 prosthesis revisions.
Conclusion: This study shows that an RSA design with a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle and an inferiorized and lateralized glenoid component is associated with significant improvements in active ROM, especially in rotation, and a low notching rate. However, rates of 3.8% for dislocation and 5% for glenoid loosening are certainly a concern at such a short follow-up of two years. Future studies with a larger population are needed to confirm these rates.
Background: Variations in humeral component designs in hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty cases can impact the degree of difficulty during a revision surgery that necessitates the removal of the humeral stem. However, no metric exists to define stem extraction effort nor to identify associated factors that contribute to extraction difficulty. The purpose of this study is to describe a method to quantify stem extraction difficulty and to define features that will impact the effort during stem removal.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of 58 patients undergoing revision of hemiarthroplasty or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty requiring stem extraction. Each included patient had existing preoperative radiographic examination, an intraoperative video of the stem removal process, and explants available for analysis by 3 surgeons. The following factors were assessed for the impact on extraction difficulty: (1) preoperative features such as cement use, fill of proximal humerus, and stem design features; (2) intraoperative data on extraction time and bone removal; and (3) postoperative findings related to extraction artifacts (EAs). A scoring system was established to distinguish easy (Easy group) and difficult (Difficult group) stem removal cases and further used to identify the features that may affect intraoperative difficulty of stem removal.
Results: The Difficult group accounted for 26% (15/58) of the study population with an 18-minute average stem extraction time, average EA count of 69, and 35 mm of bone removed. The Easy group accounted for 74% (43/58) of patients, with a 4-minute average extraction time, average EA count of 23, and 10 mm of bone removed. Logistic regression model was able to correctly classify 82% of the cases, explaining 26.7% of the variance in humeral stem removal with cement and proximal coating variables. The likelihood of cemented stem removal being difficult is 5 times greater compared to an uncemented stem, and having proximal coating doubles the likelihood of a difficult stem removal compared to cases with no coating.
Conclusions: Quantifying stem extraction difficulty is possible with intraoperative video as well as explant analysis. Preoperative features of the fixation type and specific features of stem design such as proximal coating will impact difficulty of stem extraction.
The interest of patient-specific guides (PSGs) lies in reliable intraoperative achievement of preoperative planning goals. They are a form of instrumentation optimizing intraoperative precision and thus improving the safety and reproducibility of surgical procedures. Clinical superiority, however, has not been demonstrated. The various steps from design to implementation leave room for error, which needs to be known and controlled by the surgeon who is responsible for final outcome. Instituting large-scale patient-specific surgery requires management systems for guides and innovative implants which cannot be a simple extension of current practices. We shall approach the present state of knowledge regarding PSGs via 5 questions: (1) What is a PSG? Single-use instrumentation produced after preoperative planning, aiming exclusively to optimize procedural exactness. (2) How to use and assess PSGs in orthopedic surgery? Strict rules of use must be adhered to. Any deviation from the predefined objective is, necessarily, an error that must be identified as such. (3) Do PSGs provide greater surgical exactness? The contribution of PSGs varies greatly between procedures. Exactness is enhanced in the spine, in osteotomies around the knee and in bone-tumor surgery. In the shoulder, their contribution is seen only in complex cases. Data are sparse for hip replacement, and controversial for knee replacement. (4) What are the expected benefits of PSGs? As well as improving exactness, PSGs allow a lower radiation dose and shorter operating time. They also enable junior surgeons to train in techniques otherwise reserved to hyperspecialists. (5) How to include PSGs in everyday practice? As well as their potential clinical interest, PSGs involve deep changes in organization, equipment provision and economic model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.
Keywords: 3D printing; CAOS; Patient-specific guides; Planning; Precision.
Background: Glomus tumors, also known as benign acral tumors are extremely rare. Previous glomus tumors from other regions of the body have been linked to neurological compression symptoms, however axillary compression at the scapular neck has never been described.
Case presentation: Here, we report a case of axillary nerve compression in a 47-year-old man, secondary to a glomus tumor of the neck of the right scapula, initially misdiagnosed with biceps tenodesis performed and no pain improvement. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a well-contoured, 12 mm tumefaction at the inferior pole of the scapular neck T2-hyperintense and T1-isointense and interpreted as a neuroma. An axillary approach allowed the dissection of the axillary nerve, and the tumor was completely removed. The pathological anatomical analysis resulted in a nodular red lesion measuring 14 × 10 mm, delimited and encapsulated with a definitive diagnostic of glomus tumor. The neurologic symptoms and pain disappeared 3 weeks after surgery and the patient reported satisfaction with the surgical procedure. After 3 months, the results remain stable with a complete resolution of the symptoms.
Conclusions: In cases of unexplained and atypical pain in the axillary area, and to avoid potential misdiagnoses and inappropriate treatments, an in-depth exploration for a compressive tumor should be performed as a differential diagnosis.
Introduction: In the context of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, some parameters of glenoid baseplate placement follow established golden rules, while other parameters still have no consensus. The assessment of glenoid wear in the future location of the glenoid baseplate varies among surgeons. The objective of this study was to analyze the inter-observer reproducibility of glenoid baseplate 3D positioning during virtual pre-operative planning.
Method: Four shoulder surgeons planned the glenoid baseplate position of a reverse arthroplasty in the CT scans of 30 degenerative shoulders. The position of the glenoid guide pin entry point and the glenoid baseplate center was compared between surgeons. The baseplate’s version and inclination were also analyzed.
Results: The 3D positioning of the pin entry point was achieved within ± 4 mm for nearly 100% of the shoulders. The superoinferior, anteroposterior and mediolateral positions of the baseplate center were achieved within ± 2 mm for 77.2%, 67.8% and 39.4% of the plans, respectively. The 3D orientation of the glenoid baseplate within ± 10° was inconsistent between the four surgeons (weak agreement, K=0.31, p=0.17).
Discussion: The placement of the glenoid guide pin was very consistent between surgeons. Conversely, there was little agreement on the lateralization, version and inclination criteria for positioning the glenoid baseplate between surgeons. These parameters need to be studied further in clinical practice to establish golden rules. Three-dimensional information from pre-operative planning is beneficial for assessing the glenoid deformity and for limiting its impact on the baseplate position achieved by different surgeons.
Background: Several studies have already reported good short-term results with a pyrocarbon unipolar radial head prosthesis (Pyc-uRHP). The aim was to evaluate the evolution from mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a Pyc-uRHP.
Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study. We followed up all the patients who underwent Pyc-uRHP surgery in our original study at 2 years of follow-up (52 patients), reaching a minimum of 7 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. This study included 26 patients who underwent a clinical examination assessing mobility, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the visual analog scale score and radiologic evaluation with anteroposterior and profile radiographs at a mean follow-up of 110 months (range, 78-162 months). The radiologic study analyzed signs of proximal osteolysis, stem loosening, capitellar wear, and humeroulnar osteoarthritis.
Results: No patients required revision. Eight patients required reoperation: coronoid screw removal in 1 and arthrolysis for stiffness in 7. The mean time to reoperation was 11 months. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score at last follow-up was 96 ± 9 (of 100), with a pain score of 42 ± 7 (of 45), mobility score of 19 ± 2 (of 20), stability score of 10 (of 10), and function score of 25 (of 25). Comparison with clinical data from the mid-term delay did not reveal any significant difference. All patients presented with proximal osteolysis around the neck but without progression. No stem loosening was noted. The rates of humeroulnar osteoarthritis (12% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P < .0001) and capitellar lesions (34% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P = .001) increased significantly.
Conclusion: We have shown that a Pyc-uRHP at 9 years’ follow-up provided stable and satisfactory clinical results. Osteolysis of the radial neck was always present but it did not evolve, and no stem loosening was noted. Finally, we have shown a clear worsening of radiologic humeroulnar osteoarthritis and capitellar lesions that remained asymptomatic.
Keywords: Elbow; arthritis; injury; osteolysis; prosthesis; radial head fracture; sequelae.
We retrospectively compared results of 27 wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis with mean follow-up of 67 months to 28 wrists with three-corner arthrodesis adding triquetral excision with mean follow-up of 74 months in 54 patients (55 wrists). Minimal follow-up was 2 years for all patients. Capitolunate nonunion occurred in three wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis and six wrists with three-corner arthrodesis, and radiolunate arthritis developed in four wrists with three-corner arthrodesis. Among patients with bicolumnar arthrodesis, hamatolunate arthritis occurred in seven wrists, all with a Viegas type II lunate; and pisotriquetral arthritis occurred in three wrists. At mean 5 years after surgery, 45 wrists had not needed revision surgery, and both groups had similar revision rates. The wrists with three-corner arthrodesis and bicolumnar arthrodesis had similar functional outcomes, and range of wrist motion was not significantly different between the two groups. We concluded that bicolumnar arthrodesis results in greater longevity than three-corner arthrodesis for a type I lunate. We do not recommend bicolumnar arthrodesis for type II lunate. We also concluded that three-corner arthrodesis has a greater incidence of radiolunate arthritis and capitolunate nonunion.
Volar plating is one of the most used surgical treatments for dorsally displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures. However, the reduction of the dorsal tilt can be difficult. It usually requires a flexion maneuver of the wrist while maintaining and screwing the plate, which is cumbersome. Plate positioning also is a crucial step and is sometimes difficult because of the large size of the plate relative to the width of the distal radius. We use an epiphysis-first technique. We place all the epiphyseal screws before reduction, and then we take advantage of the anatomical shape of a locking plate to automatically reduce the dorsal tilt by fixing the proximal radius to the plate with cortical compression screws. To ensure easy and accurate positioning of the plate, we drill a distal medial pilot hole in a free-hand fashion 10 mm proximal to the watershed line and 10 mm lateral to the medial rim of the radius, without positioning the plate. This allows a clear view of the location of this first hole. The locking plate is then applied to the distal radius with help of a monocortical non-locking screw, and it is controlled under fluoroscopy. When this medial pilot hole is properly positioned and the plate correctly tilted on the anteroposterior view, the remaining epiphyseal holes are filled with locking screws. Then the plate is fixed on the proximal radius with bicortical compression screws, allowing an automatic reduction of the epiphyseal dorsal tilt. We believe this technique is a safe and reproducible way to position volar plates and to reduce anatomically the dorsal tilt in extra-articular posteriorly displaced distal radius fractures (AO A2 and A3). Furthermore, the automatic fracture reduction provided by this technique decreases operation time and radiation.
Background: Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (STA) has been proposed for the treatment of painful scapular winging in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). However, the rate of osseous fusion is variable, and there is a theoretical risk of reduced respiratory function after bilateral STA.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 10 STAs, performed sequentially, in 5 FSHD patients. The surgical technique involved use of a semitubular plate and wire construct with autograft (iliac crest) interposed between the scapula and rib cage. Osseous fusion, respiratory function, and shoulder function were evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 141 ± 67 months (range, 24-225 months).
Results: Early complications included 1 pneumothorax and 1 pleural effusion. No late complications occurred, and no patients underwent reoperation. On postoperative computed tomography images, complete bony union of the scapula to the ribs was observed in 90% of shoulders (9 of 10). Comparison of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function test results showed no significant difference in vital capacity (from 87% ± 14% to 85% ± 12%) and forced vital capacity (from 86% ± 16% to 77% ± 15%). Patients gained on average 40° of active forward elevation (from 62° ± 20° to 102° ± 4°) and 22° of abduction (from 58° ± 21° to 89° ± 7°) (P < .001). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 25% ± 8% to 72% ± 18% (P < .001). All patients were pleased with the results and would recommend the procedure to other persons.
Conclusion: In patients with FSHD, bilateral STA provides satisfactory shoulder function with a high rate of scapulothoracic fusion and few or no significant respiratory repercussions.
Background: Our aim was to analyze the epidemiology, etiologies, and revision options for failed shoulder arthroplasty from 2 tertiary centers.
Methods: From 1993 to 2013, 542 failed arthroplasties were revised in 540 patients (65% women): 224 hemiarthroplasties (HAs, 41%), 237 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs, 44%) and 81 reverse total arthroplasties (RSAs, 15%). Data about patients, pathology, and reintervention procedures, as well as intraoperative data, were analyzed from our 2 local registries that prospectively captured all the revision procedures. Patients had an average follow-up period of 8.7 years.
Results: The revision rate was 12.7% for HAs, 6.7% for TSAs, and 3.9% for RSAs. HAs were revised earlier (33 ± 40 months) than RSAs (47 ± 150 months) and TSAs (69 ± 61 months). Glenoid failure was a major cause of reintervention: erosion in HAs (29%) or loosening in TSAs (37%) and RSAs (24%). Instability was another major cause of reintervention: 32% in RSAs, 20% in TSAs, and 13% in HAs. Humeral implant loosening led to revision in 10% of RSAs, 6% of HAs, and 6% of TSAs. Multiple reinterventions were required in 21% of patients, mainly for instability (26%) and/or infection (25%). The final implant was an RSA in 48%, especially when associated with cuff insufficiency, instability, and/or bone loss. Final reimplantation was possible in 90% of cases, with the remaining 10% treated with a resection or spacer.
Conclusion: Glenoid failure and instability are the most common causes of revision. Soft-tissue insufficiency and/or infection results in multiple revisions. Surgeons must recognize all complications so that they can be addressed at the first revision operation and avoid further reinterventions. RSA was the most common final revision implant.
Introduction: Antegrade percutaneous intra-medullary nailing (IMN) has a poor reputation in the treatment of humerus fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after IMN in humerus fracture.
Hypothesis: Third-generation humeral nails (straight, small diameter, with locked screws) conserve rotator cuff tendon integrity and avoid the shoulder stiffness and pain incurred by 1st generation (large diameter, without self-blocking screw) and 2nd generation nails (curved, penetrating the supraspinatus insertion on the greater tuberosity).
Methods: Forty patients (26 female, 14 male; mean age, 60 years (range, 20-89 years)) with displaced humeral fracture (23 proximal humerus, 17 humeral shaft) underwent IMN using a 3rd generation nail (34 Aequalis™ (Tornier-Wright), 6 MultiLoc™ (Depuy-Synthes)). Mean clinical, radiologic and ultrasound follow-up was 8 months (range, 6-18 months); 22 patients agreed to postoperative CT scan.
Results: There were no revision surgeries for rotator cuff repair or secondary bone displacement. Mean Adjusted Constant Score (ACS) was 93±22% and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) 77±18%. Elevation was 140±36°, external rotation 48±22° and internal rotation was to L3. Ultrasound found: 5 supraspinatus tendon lesions (12.5%) (2 full and 3 deep partial tears) without functional impact (ACS) 91% without vs. 107% with tear; (p=0.12); 2 of the deep partial tears involved excessively lateral and high nail positioning. Eight patients (20%) had painful tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon associated with significantly impaired functional scores (ACS 65% vs. 100%; p<0.001); and 4 cases of technical error: 3 of anterior LHB screwing in the groove, and 1 of LHB irritation due to an excessively long posterior screw.
Conclusion: Supraspinatus tendon lesions following IMN with a 3rd-generation humeral nail were rare (12.5%) and asymptomatic; prevalence was not higher than in the general population in the literature (16%). LHB tendinopathy was frequent (20%) and symptomatic, and due to technical error in half of the cases.
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is offered to young patients with a failed previous arthroplasty or a cuff-deficient shoulder, but the overall results are still uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to report the midterm outcomes and complications of RSA in patients younger than 65 years.
Methods: A search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases identified clinical studies reporting the results, at a minimum 2-year follow-up, of patients younger than 65 years treated with an RSA. The methodologic quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score by 2 independent reviewers. Complications, reoperations, range of motion, functional scores, and radiologic outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Eight articles were included, with a total of 417 patients. The mean age at surgery was 56 years (range, 21-65 years). RSA was used as a primary arthroplasty in 79% of cases and revision of a failed arthroplasty in 21%. In primary cases, the indications were cuff tear arthropathy and/or massive irreparable cuff tear in 72% of cases. The overall complication rate was 17% (range, 7%-38%), with the most common complications being instability (5%) and infection (4%). The reintervention rate was 10% at 4 years, with implant revision in 7% of cases. The mean weighted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, active forward elevation, and external rotation were 64 points, 121°, and 29°, respectively.
Conclusions: RSA provides reliable clinical improvements in patients younger than 65 years with a cuff-deficient shoulder or failed arthroplasty. The complication and revision rates are comparable to those in older patients.
Background: We evaluated survival and midterm results of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) in arthritic patients younger than 65 years.
Methods: Fifty-eight PISAs (InSpyre; Tornier-Wright, Bloomington, MN, USA), implanted in 56 patients between 2010 and 2015, were prospectively observed. The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 13 years. The cause was primary osteoarthritis (18), fracture sequelae (16), post-instability arthritis (15), aseptic necrosis (3), inflammatory disease (2), and failed hemiarthroplasty (4); 34 shoulders (61%) had previously undergone surgery. Glenoid erosion was assessed in 4 grades according to the Sperling classification. Humeral erosion was also assessed in 4 grades. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predisposing risk factors for both humeral and glenoid erosion.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 47 ± 15 months, survival rate was 90%. Six patients (10%) required conversion to reverse total shoulder prosthesis for painful glenoid erosion (n = 2) and humeral erosion with greater tuberosity stress fractures (n = 4). The mean Constant score and subjective shoulder value significantly increased from 36 ± 14 points to 70 ± 15 points and 32% ± 14% to 75% ± 19%, respectively (P < .001). Humeral medialization was observed in 78% of the cases with increased pain score. Uncorrected anteroposterior implant subluxation (12 cases) was associated with lower Constant score (50 points vs. 72 points; P = .02) and lower subjective shoulder value (53% vs. 78%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, no risk factors for glenoid or humeral erosion were found.
Conclusion: At midterm follow-up, PISA does not protect from progressive glenoid erosion and can lead to greater tuberosity erosion and stress fractures. Longer follow-up is required to see whether PISA survival will be superior to that of hemiarthroplasty.
Background: Avoiding superior inclination of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is crucial. We hypothesized that superior inclination was underestimated in RSA. Our purpose was to describe and assess a new measurement of inclination for the inferior portion of the glenoid (where the baseplate rests).
Methods: The study included 47 shoulders with rotator cuff tear arthropathy (mean age, 76 years). The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle), defined as the angle between the inferior part of the glenoid fossa and the perpendicular to the floor of the supraspinatus, was compared with the global glenoid inclination (β angle or total shoulder arthroplasty [TSA] angle). Measurements were made on plain anteroposterior radiographs and reformatted 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans by 3 independent observers and compared with 3-dimensional (3D) software (Glenosys) measurements.
Results: The mean RSA angle was 25° ± 8° on plain radiographs, 20° ± 6° on reformatted 2D CT scans, and 21° ± 5° via 3D reconstruction software. The mean TSA angle was on average 10° ± 5° lower than the mean RSA angle (P < .001); this difference was observed regardless of the method of measurement (radiographs, 2D CT, or 3D CT) and type of glenoid erosion according to Favard. In Favard type E1 glenoids with central concentric erosion, the difference between the 2 angles was 12° ± 4° (P < .001).
Conclusion: The same angle cannot be used to measure glenoid inclination in anatomic and reverse prostheses. The TSA (or β) angle underestimates the superior orientation of the reverse baseplate in RSA. The RSA angle (20° ± 5°) needs to be corrected to achieve neutral inclination of the baseplate (RSA angle = 0°). Surgeons should be aware that E1 glenoids (with central erosion) are at risk for baseplate superior tilt if the RSA angle is not corrected.
Background: The Walch classification describes glenoid morphology in primary arthritis. As knowledge grows, several modifications to the classification have been proposed. The type D, a recent modification, was defined as an anteverted glenoid with or without anterior subluxation. Literature on the anteverted glenoid in primary osteoarthritis is limited. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to analyze the anatomic characteristics of the type D glenoid on radiographs and computed tomography (CT).
Methods: The shoulder arthroplasty databases from 3 institutions were examined to identify patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and glenoid anteversion (≥5°), with or without anterior subluxation. The type D study cohort consisted of 18 patients (3% of the osteoarthritis cohort) and was a mean of 70 years old, with 11 women and 7 men. All radiographs were reviewed, and computed tomography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA) data were analyzed on validated 3-dimensional imaging software. Rotator cuff fatty infiltration, glenoid measurements (anteversion and inclination), and humeral head subluxation according to the scapular plane were determined.
Results: In the study cohort, the mean glenoid anteversion was 12° (range, 5°-24°), the mean inclination was 0°, and the mean anterior subluxation was 38% (range, 6%-56%). Eight patients (44%) had a biconcave glenoid with a posterosuperiorly positioned paleoglenoid and an anteroinferiorly positioned neoglenoid, and 10 patients had a monoconcave glenoid. Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles never exceeded Goutallier stage 2.
Conclusion: The type D glenoid is an addition to the original Walch classification and is characterized by glenoid anteversion (≥5°), anteroinferior humeral head subluxation, and absence of severe subscapularis fatty infiltration.
Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients
Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients
Introduction: Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures is recommended in an active population to avoid loss of strength, especially in supination and flexion.
Hypothesis: A double incision repair technique with immediate postoperative mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures is safe and provides good results after 2 years in active patients.
Material and methods: Seventy-four men (47±7 years) with acute tears of the distal biceps tendon tears were included in this retrospective single-center study. All patients were operated using the double-incision repair technique described by Morrey. The tendon was inserted with transosseous sutures into the biceps tuberosity. Patients were allowed to perform immediate postoperative active mobilization. A minimum follow-up of two years was required including clinical and radiological evaluation.
Results: Sixteen patients were lost to follow up leaving 58 (78%) patients for analysis with a mean follow-up of 53±19 months. At final follow-up, the mean evaluation for pain on the VAS scale was 0.22±0.7. Mean range of motion results included extension -1°±2°, flexion 138°±6°, pronation 72°±16° and supination 81°±10°. The strength ratio in flexion was 94±8% and in supination 90.5±12% compared to the contralateral limb. Subjective elbow value and DASH score were respectively 94±6% and 7.5±9%. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied and all except one returned to their previous sport. We noticed 2 heterotopic ossifications and one patient needed a reoperation for a radioulnar synostosis. Neither re-rupture nor nerve injury were observed.
Discussion: A double incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair is a minimally invasive procedure with reliable results. Morrey’s modification of the initial procedure associated with early mobilization is associated with a low rate of complications and limited the occurrence of synostosis or ossifications.
Level of evidence: IV, case series, with no comparison group.
Keywords: Distal biceps tear; Double incision technique; Early mobilisation; No nerve palsy.
Aims: The Walch Type C dysplastic glenoid is characterized by excessive retroversion. This anatomical study describes its morphology.
Patients and methods: A total of 29 shoulders with a dysplastic glenoid were analyzed. CT was used to measure retroversion, inclination, height, width, radius-of-curvature, surface area, depth, subluxation of the humeral head and the Goutallier classification of fatty infiltration. The severity of dysplasia and deficiency of the posterior rim of the glenoid were recorded.
Results: A type C glenoid occurred in 1.8% of shoulders referred to our tertiary centres. The mean retroversion, inclination, height, width, radius-of-curvature, surface area, and depth of the glenoid were 37°, 3°, 46 mm, 30 mm, 37°, 1284 mm3, and 16 mm, respectively. The mean posterior subluxation was 90%. The Goutallier class was < 2 in 25 shoulders (86%). Glenoid dysplasia was mild in four, moderate in 14, and severe in 11 shoulders. The typical appearance of the posterior glenoid rim had a rounded or ‘lazy J’ morphology. The glenoid neck was deficient in 18 shoulders (62%).
Conclusion: A dysplastic Type C glenoid characteristically has a uniconcave retroverted morphology, a deficient posteroinferior rim and scapular neck, and a reduced depth. These findings help to define the unique anatomical variations and may aid the planning of surgery and the development of components for these patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1074-9.
Background: The MoPyC implant is an uncemented long-stemmed radial head prosthesis that obtains primary press-fit fixation via controlled expansion of the stem. Current literature regarding MoPyC implants appears promising; however, sample sizes in these studies are small. Our primary objective was to evaluate the short- to midterm clinical outcomes of a large sample of the MoPyC prostheses. The secondary objective was to determine the reasons for failure of the MoPyC devices.
Methods: Four electronic databases were queried for literature published between January 2000 and March 2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as reasons for reoperation were included. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), radiographic outcome, and reason for failure.
Results: A total of five articles describing 171 patients (82 males) with MoPyC implants were included. Mean patient age and follow-up were 52 years (18-79) and 3.1 years (1-9), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (MEPS > 74) in 157 patients. Overall complication rate was low (n = 22), while periprosthetic osteolysis was reported in 78 patients. Nineteen patients returned to the operating room, with implant revision being required in ten patients. The two primary reasons for failure were (intra-)prosthetic dislocation (n = 8) followed by stiffness (n = 7); no painful loosening was described.
Conclusion: Short- to midterm outcomes of MoPyC prostheses are satisfactory and complications associated are low. The use of stem auto-expansion as a mode of obtaining primary fixation in radial head arthroplasty appears to be an effective solution for reducing the risk of painful loosening.
Keywords: Auto-expandable stem; Failure; MoPyC; Outcomes; Radial head arthroplasty; Radial head prosthesis; Survival.
Close
Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty
Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty
Purpose: Glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is influenced by the position of the glenoid component. 3D planning software and patient-specific guides seem to improve positioning accuracy, but their respective individual application and role are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of freehand implantation after 3D pre-operative planning and to compare its accuracy to that of a targeting guide.
Method: Seventeen patients scheduled for TSA for primary glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in this prospective study. Every patient had pre-operative planning, based on a CT scan. Glenoid component implantation was performed freehand, guided by 3D views displayed in the operating room. The position of the glenoid component was determined by manual segmentation of post-operative CT scans and compared to the planned position. The results were compared to those obtained in a previous work with the use of a patient-specific guide.
Results: The mean error for the central point was 2.89 mm (SD ± 1.36) with the freehand method versus 2.1 mm (SD ± 0.86) with use of a targeting guide (p = 0.05). The observed difference was more significant (p = 0.03) for more severely retroverted glenoids (> 10°). The mean errors for version and inclination were respectively 4.82° (SD ± 3.12) and 4.2° (SD ± 2.14) with freehand method, compared to 4.87° (SD ± 3.61) and 4.39° (SD ± 3.36) with a targeting guide (p = 0.97 and 0.85, respectively).
Conclusion: 3D pre-operative planning allowed accurate glenoid component positioning with a freehand method. Compared to the freehand method, patient-specific guides slightly improved the position of the central point, especially for severely retroverted glenoids, but not the orientation of the component.
Keywords: 3D planning; Accuracy; Glenoid component; Patient-specific guides; Positioning; Total shoulder arthroplasty.
Close
The CJOrtho app: A mobile clinical and educational tool for orthopedics
The CJOrtho app: A mobile clinical and educational tool for orthopedics
The need for modern patient evaluation tools continues to grow. A dependable and reproducible assessment provides objective follow-up and increases the validity of collected data. This is where mobile apps come into play, as they provide a link between surgeons and patients. They also open the possibility of interacting with other healthcare staff to exchange common scientific reference systems and databases. The CJOrtho app provides fast access to 65 classification systems in orthopedics or trauma surgery, 20 clinical outcome scores and a digital goniometer. The development of free mobile apps is an opportunity for education and better follow-up, while meeting the demands of patients.
Keywords: Classifications; Clinical scores; Goniometer; Mobile app.
Aims: Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed glenoid components.
Materials and methods: A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs, 46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23 were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender, preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3 years (5 to 12, sd 26) postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision as the endpoint.
Results: A total of 26 shoulders (38%) underwent revision surgery: ten (22%) in the polyethylene group and 16 (70%) in the metal-backed group (p < 0.0001). At 12 years’ follow-up, the rate of implant survival was 74% (sd 0.09) for polyethylene components and 24% (sd 0.10) for metal-backed components (p < 0.0002). Glenoid loosening or failure was the indication for revision in the polyethylene group, whereas polyethylene wear with metal-on-metal contact, instability, and insufficiency of the rotator cuff were the indications for revision in the metal-backed group. Preoperative posterior subluxation of the humeral head with a biconcave/retroverted glenoid (Walch B2) had an adverse effect on the survival of a metal-backed component.
Conclusion: The survival of a cemented polyethylene glenoid component is three times higher than that of a cementless metal-backed glenoid component ten years after aTSA in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Patients with a biconcave (B2) glenoid have the highest risk of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:485-92.
Background: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements of glenoid version and inclination are recommended for planning glenoid implantation in shoulder arthroplasty. However, current manual or semi-automated 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) methods are user-dependent and time-consuming. We assessed whether the use of a 3D automated method is accurate and reliable to measure glenoid version and inclination in osteoarthritic shoulders.
Methods: CT scans of osteoarthritic shoulders of 60 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty were obtained. Automated, surgeon-operated, image analysis software (Glenosys; Imascap) was developed to measure glenoid version and inclination. The anatomic scapular reference planes were defined as the mean of the peripheral points of the scapular body as well as the plane perpendicular to it, passing along the supraspinatus fossa line. Measurements were compared with those obtained using previously described manual or semi-automated methods, including the Friedman version angle on 2D CTs, Friedman method on 3D multiplanar reconstructions (corrected Friedman method), Ganapathi-Iannotti and Lewis-Armstrong methods on 3D volumetric reconstructions (for glenoid version), and Maurer method (for glenoid inclination).The mean differences (and standard deviation) and the concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated. Two orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the images for the interobserver analysis, with one of them measuring them twice more for the intraobserver analysis; interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results: The mean difference in the Glenosys glenoid version measurement was 2.0° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.93) compared with the Friedman method, 2.5° ± 3.2° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the corrected Friedman method, 1.5° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.94) compared with the Ganapathi-Iannotti method, and 1.8° ± 3.8° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the Lewis-Armstrong method. There was a mean difference of 0.2° ± 4.7° (CCC = 0.78) between the inclination measurements made with the Glenosys and Maurer methods. The difference between the overall average 2D and 3D measurements was not significant (p = 0.45).
Conclusions: Use of fully automated software for 3D measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders is reliable and accurate, showing excellent correlation with previously described manual or semi-automated methods.
Clinical relevance: The use of automated surgeon-operated image analysis software to evaluate 3D glenoid anatomy eliminates interobserver and intraobserver discrepancies, improves the accuracy of preoperative planning for shoulder replacement, and offers a potential gain of time for the surgeon.
Close
Publications 2017 du Dr GAUCI Marc-Olivier
Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion
Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion
Background: Glenoid deficiency and erosion (excessive retroversion/inclination) must be corrected in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to avoid prosthetic notching or instability and to maximize function, range of motion, and prosthesis longevity. This study reports the results of RSA with an angled, autologous glenoid graft harvested from the humerus (angled BIO-RSA).
Methods: A trapezoidal bone graft, harvested from the humeral head and fixed with a long-post baseplate and screws, was used to compensate for residual glenoid bone loss/erosion. For simple to moderate (<25°) glenoid defects, standardized instrumentation combined with some eccentric reaming (<15°) was used to reconstruct the glenoid and obtain neutral implant alignment. For severe (>25°) and complex (multiplanar) glenoid bone defects, patient-specific grafts and guides were used after 3-dimensional planning. Patients were reviewed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-81 months). Preoperative and postoperative measurements of inclination and version were performed in the plane of the scapula on computed tomography images.
Results: The study included 54 patients (41 women, 13 men; mean 73 years old). Fifteen patients had combined vertical and horizontal glenoid bone deficiency. Among E2/E3 glenoids, inclination improved from 37° (range, 14° to 84°) to 10.2° (range -28° to 36°, P < .001). Among B2/C glenoids, retroversion improved from -21° (range, -49° to 0°) to -10.6° (-32° to 4°, P = .06). Complete radiographic incorporation of the graft occurred in 94% (51 of 54). Complications included infection in 1 and clinical aseptic baseplate loosening in 2. Mild notching occurred in 25% (13 of 51) of patients. Constant-Murley and Subjective Shoulder Value assessments increased from 31 to 68 and from 30% to 83%, respectively (P < .001).
Conclusion: Angled BIO-RSA predictably corrects glenoid deficiency, including severe (>25°) multiplanar deformity. Graft incorporation is predictable. Advantages of using an autograftharvested in situ include bone stock augmentation, lateralization, low donor-site morbidity, low relative cost, and flexibility needed to simultaneously correct posterior and superior glenoid defects.
Background: Posterior humeral subluxation is the main cause of failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. We aimed to compare humeral head subluxation in various reference planes and to search for a correlation with retroversion, inclination, and glenoid wear.
Materials and methods: We included 109 computed tomography scans of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and 97 of shoulder problems unrelated to shoulder osteoarthritis (controls); all computed tomography scans were reconstructed in the anatomic scapular plane and the glenoid hull plane that we defined. In both planes, we measured retroversion, inclination, glenohumeral offset (Walch index), and scapulohumeral offset.
Results: Retroversion in the scapular plane (Friedman method) was lower than that in the glenoid hull plane for controls and for arthritic shoulders. The threshold of scapulohumeral subluxation was 60% and 65% in the scapular plane and glenoid hull plane, respectively. The mean upward inclination was lower in the scapular plane (Churchill method) than in the glenoid hull plane (Maurer method). In the glenoid hull plane, 35% of type A2 glenoids showed glenohumeral offset greater than 75%, with mean retroversion of 25.6° ± 6° as compared with 7.5° ± 7.2° for the « centered » type A2 glenoids (P < .0001) and an upward inclination of -1.4° ± 8° and 6.3° ± 7° (P = .03), respectively. The correlation between retroversion and scapulohumeral offset was r = 0.64 in the glenoid hull plane and r = 0.59 in the scapular plane (P < .05).
Conclusion: Measurement in the glenoid hull plane may be more accurate than in the scapular plane. Thus, the glenoid hull method allows for better understanding type B3 of the modified Walch classification.
Background: The concept of free interposition arthroplasty proved successful for small joints of the hand, wrist, and foot, particularly after the use of implants coated with pyrocarbon, which enhanced their tribologic and elastic properties. The present study reports preliminary outcomes of a pyrocarbon-coated interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) implant.
Methods: This was a prospective study of 67 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder PISA at 9 centers. The mean age at surgery was 51 years, with only 12 patients older than 60 years. The indications for surgery were primary glenohumeral arthritis in 42, avascular necrosis in 13, and secondary arthritis in 12 patients.
Results: Revision surgery was performed in 7 patients (10.4%), 2 (3.0%) were lost to follow-up, and the outcome assessments were incomplete in 3 (4.4%). This left 55 patients, aged 49.3 ± 12.0 years, with complete outcomes assessments at a mean follow-up of 26.8 ± 3.4 months. The Constant score improved from 34.1 ± 15.1 preoperatively to 66.1 ± 19.7 postoperatively. The radiographic findings revealed erosion in 6 glenoids and thinning of 3 humeral tuberosities.
Conclusion: In a cohort of young arthritic patients, PISA renders clinical scores and implant survival comparable to those of hemishoulder arthroplasty but remain inferior to those results reported for total shoulder arthroplasty. The study enabled identification of contraindications and potential causes of failure that wererelated to the concept of free interposition and smaller radius of curvature of the sphere. Until long-term results are available, this type of innovative implant should remain to be tested in a few specialized shoulder centers.
Background: The type B3 glenoid is an addition to the Walch classification. A potential etiologic theory is that it is a progression of the B2. It is characterized by uniconcavity, absent paleoglenoid, medialization, retroversion, and subluxation. The purpose of this study was to describe the morphology of B3 glenoids.
Methods: Fifty-two patients with B3 glenoids underwent 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography data. Glenoid measurements (retroversion, inclination, medialization) and humeral head subluxation according to the scapular and glenoid planes were determined. The measured variables were compared between male and female patients.
Results: The mean B3 retroversion, inclination, and medialization were 24° ± 7°, 8° ± 6° superior, and 14 ± 4 mm, respectively. The mean posterior subluxation was 80% ± 8% and 54% ± 6% according to the scapular and glenoid planes, respectively. There were no differences in B3 characteristics between sexes (P > .05). A significant correlation existed between glenoid retroversion and humeral head subluxation relative to the scapular plane, with every 1° increase in retroversion translating to a 1% increase in subluxation (P < .001). In contrast, when referencing the glenoid plane, the humeral head remained concentric to the erosion.
Conclusions: The B3 is uniconcave and retroverted. As glenoid retroversion increases, posterior humeral head subluxation significantly increases as referenced to the scapular plane; however, when referenced to the glenoid plane, the head remains concentric to the erosion. This appearance of « concentricity » is acquired secondary to the wear pattern, creating a uniconcave glenoid. Therefore, surgeons should be aware that the visualized concentricity is a product of the erosion pattern and thus may conceal a greater amount of subluxation potential.
Adaptive carpal malalignment is the consequence of malunion of the distal radius. Since the radial metaphysis and capitate have to be aligned, any disorientation of the radial epiphysis will force the proximal carpal row to adapt, as it is the only mobile element. There are two types of adaptation depending where the compensative occurs: (1) midcarpal – leading to flexion between the lunate and capitate, with the lunate maintaining a normal relationship with the radial epiphysis axis; (2) radiocarpal – combining flexion and dorsal displacement of the lunate relative to the axis of the radial epiphysis, with the midcarpal joint remaining aligned. Clinically, adaptive carpal malalignment is not the first reason for consultation in cases of distal radius malunion. It occurs in cases of moderate deformity with preserved pronation-supination in a young patient who has good mobility. It generates dorsal pain that may be associated with a snapping sensation. The diagnosis requires strict lateral X-ray views. Over time, the wrist becomes stiff but analgesic and is often well tolerated functionally. This type of deformity has not been shown to lead to osteoarthritis. Osteotomy to correct the malunion is the only way to treat adaptive carpal malalignment in active young patients who have a mobile but painful wrist.
Keywords: Cal vicieux; Carpal malalignment; Distal radial fracture; Désaxation du carpe; Fracture du radius distal; Malunion.
Background: The concept of free interposition arthroplasty proved successful for small joints of the hand, wrist, and foot, particularly after the use of implants coated with pyrocarbon, which enhanced their tribologic and elastic properties. The present study reports preliminary outcomes of a pyrocarbon-coated interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) implant.
Methods: This was a prospective study of 67 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder PISA at 9 centers. The mean age at surgery was 51 years, with only 12 patients older than 60 years. The indications for surgery were primary glenohumeral arthritis in 42, avascular necrosis in 13, and secondary arthritis in 12 patients.
Results: Revision surgery was performed in 7 patients (10.4%), 2 (3.0%) were lost to follow-up, and the outcome assessments were incomplete in 3 (4.4%). This left 55 patients, aged 49.3 ± 12.0 years, with complete outcomes assessments at a mean follow-up of 26.8 ± 3.4 months. The Constant score improved from 34.1 ± 15.1 preoperatively to 66.1 ± 19.7 postoperatively. The radiographic findings revealed erosion in 6 glenoids and thinning of 3 humeral tuberosities.
Conclusion: In a cohort of young arthritic patients, PISA renders clinical scores and implant survival comparable to those of hemishoulder arthroplasty but remain inferior to those results reported for total shoulder arthroplasty. The study enabled identification of contraindications and potential causes of failure that wererelated to the concept of free interposition and smaller radius of curvature of the sphere. Until long-term results are available, this type of innovative implant should remain to be tested in a few specialized shoulder centers. Keywords: Glenohumeral arthritis; interposition arthroplasty; osteoarthritis; pyrocarbon; pyrolytic carbon; shoulder arthroplasty.
M-O Gauci, H Lenoir, T Waitzenegger, J Andrin, C Lazerges, B Coulet, M Chammas
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27890211/
Abstract
Extra-articular distal radius fractures in young active patients are typically the result of sport injuries or traffic accidents. Displaced fractures are less well tolerated in young patients than in older people, especially in terms of dorsal tilt and radial shortening. Non-surgical treatment is only indicated when the fracture is minimally or not displaced. No fracture fixation method is superior to another, however, the treatment goal is a rapid return to previous activities.
Aims: Patient-specific glenoid guides (PSGs) claim an improvement in accuracy and reproducibility of the positioning of components in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The results have not yet been confirmed in a prospective clinical trial. Our aim was to assess whether the use of PSGs in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder would allow accurate and reliable implantation of the glenoid component.
Patients and methods: A total of 17 patients (three men and 14 women) with a mean age of 71 years (53 to 81) awaiting TSA were enrolled in the study. Pre- and post-operative version and inclination of the glenoid were measured on CT scans, using 3D planning automatic software. During surgery, a congruent 3D-printed PSG was applied onto the glenoid surface, thus determining the entry point and orientation of the central guide wire used for reaming the glenoid and the introduction of the component. Manual segmentation was performed on post-operative CT scans to compare the planned and the actual position of the entry point (mm) and orientation of the component (°).
Results: The mean error in the accuracy of the entry point was -0.1 mm (standard deviation (sd) 1.4) in the horizontal plane, and 0.8 mm (sd 1.3) in the vertical plane. The mean error in the orientation of the glenoid component was 3.4° (sd 5.1°) for version and 1.8° (sd 5.3°) for inclination.
Conclusion: Pre-operative planning with automatic software and the use of PSGs provides accurate and reproducible positioning and orientation of the glenoid component in anatomical TSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1080-5.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Patient specific guides; Three-dimensional; Total shoulder arthroplasty and Glenoid component; Validation.
Background: Since Walch and colleagues originally classified glenoid morphology in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, several authors have reported varying levels of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. We propose several modifications to the Walch classification that we hypothesize will increase interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Methods: We propose the addition of the B3 and D glenoids and a more precise definition of the A2 glenoid. The B3 glenoid is monoconcave and worn preferentially in its posterior aspect, leading to pathologic retroversion of at least 15° or subluxation of 70%, or both. The D glenoid is defined by glenoid anteversion or anterior humeral head subluxation. The A2 glenoid has a line connecting the anterior and posterior native glenoid rims that transects the humeral head. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography glenoid reconstructions, 3 evaluators used the original Walch classification and the modified Walch classification to classify 129 nonconsecutive glenoids on 4 separate occasions. Reliabilities were assessed by calculating κ coefficients.
Results: Interobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.391 (indicating fair agreement) using the original classification to an average of 0.703 (substantial agreement) using the modified classification. Intraobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.605 (moderate agreement) to an average of 0.882 (nearly perfect agreement).
Conclusion: When 3-dimensional glenoid reconstructions and the modified Walch classification described herein are used, improved interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities are obtained.
Background: The β-angle, formed by the intersection of a line on the floor of the supraspinatus fossa and glenoid fossa line, has been described as a reliable measurement tool in the clinical setting to analyze glenoid inclination on the anteroposterior (AP) view of the shoulder. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the β-angle measurement using different imaging modalities with a validated 3-dimensional (3D) software tool.
Materials and methods: The β-angle was measured on AP radiographs, unformatted 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scan, and reformatted 2D CT scan in the scapular plane for 51 shoulders of 49 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Comparison to the glenoid inclination angle calculated by the 3D software was performed.
Results: The β-angle measured on reformatted CT scan was found to be the most accurate measurement method, with a mean difference of 1° (standard deviation [SD], 0.5°) with respect to 3D measurement. On AP radiographs, the β-angle was not as accurate, with a mean difference of 3° (SD, 0.7°; P < .006). The β-angle on unformatted 2D CT scan was not a reliable method to measure glenoid inclination, with a mean difference of 10° (SD, 0.9°; P < .0001).
Conclusion: The β-angle measured with 2D CT scan formatted in the scapular plane was the most accurate method for measuring glenoid inclination. The β-angle on the AP radiograph is less accurate and reliable. Measurement of the β-angle on an unformatted 2D CT scan is not an acceptable method to determine glenoid inclination.
Keywords: 3D software; CT scan; Glenoid inclination; measurement method; β-angle.
Background: The modular pyrocarbon (MoPyC) radial head prosthesis (Tornier, Saint-Ismier, France) is a monoblock modular radial head prosthesis. This study assessed midterm outcomes after implantation of the prosthesis.
Materials: A retrospective study was conducted of a consecutive cohort of 65 patients who underwent radial head replacement with the MoPyC prosthesis from January 2006 to April 2013. Indications were fractures, early or late failures from orthopedic or fixation treatments, and revisions after another implant. Patients were observed for >2 years for range of motion, pain, and stability; function by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (total score, 100) and grip strength were assessed. Quality of stem implantation, bone resorption around the neck, and periprosthetic lucency were noted and quantified on radiographs. Capitellum shape and density as well as humeroulnar aspect (river delta sign) were evaluated. Complications and revision procedures were noted.
Results: We evaluated 52 of 65 patients (mean follow-up, 46 ± 20 months; range, 24-108). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 96 ± 7; pain score, 42 ± 7/45; and motion score, 18 ± 2/20. Function and stability were excellent. Radiology revealed 92% of patients with cortical resorption around the neck without mechanical failure. Bone resorption was mostly anterior and lateral; it resolved within the first year and thereafter was stable. Eight patients underwent revision surgery for stiffness. No implant failures were noted.
Conclusion: Results of the MoPyC radial head prosthesis appear to be satisfactory. Bone resorption around the neck (stress shielding) is frequent and stable after 1 year and does not impair stem fixation. The MoPyC prosthesis appears to be a reliable solution for replacing the radial head.
Background: Increased critical shoulder angles consist of both the acromial cover and glenoid inclination and have been found in patients with rotator cuff pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation of the critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination and to determine the difference in glenoid inclination between patients with osteoarthritis and massive rotator cuff tears.
Methods: The critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination were measured on anteroposterior radiographs, and glenoid inclination was also measured on a validated 3-dimensional computer software program of 50 shoulders undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-five shoulders had osteoarthritis and A1 glenoids, as defined by the Walch classification, and were undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The other 25 shoulders had massive rotator cuff tears and E0 glenoids, as defined by the Favard classification. The 2 groups were compared.
Results: Critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination were significantly correlated (R(2) = 0.7426, P < .001). Shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears (E0) demonstrated increased glenoid inclination measurements than shoulders with osteoarthritis (A1). As measured by the 3-dimensional software, the massive rotator cuff group had a glenoid inclination of 13.6° ± 4.3° and the osteoarthritis group had a glenoid inclination of 4.7° ± 5.6°. When measured by anteroposterior radiographs, the average glenoid inclination was 13.6° ± 4.6° in the massive rotator cuff group and was 7.6° ± 5.01° in the osteoarthritic group .
Conclusion: Glenoid inclination is linearly correlated with the critical shoulder angle and is significantly increased in patients with massive rotator cuff tears.
Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common compressive neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. The accessory anconeus epitrochlearis muscle – present in 4% to 34% of the general population – is a known, but rare cause of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The aim of this article was to expand our knowledge about this condition based on six cases that we encountered at our hospital between 2011 and 2015. Every patient had a typical clinical presentation: hypoesthesia or sensory deficit in the fourth and fifth fingers; potential intrinsics atrophy of the fourth intermetacarpal space; loss of strength and difficulty with fifth finger abduction. Although it can be useful to have the patient undergo ultrasonography or MRI to aid in the diagnosis, only electromyography (EMG) was performed in our patients. EMG revealed clear compression in the ulnar groove, with conduction block and a large drop in nerve conduction velocity. Treatment typically consists of conservative treatment first (splint, analgesics). Surgical treatment should be considered when conservative treatment has failed or the patient presents severe neurological deficits. In all of our patients, the ulnar nerve was surgically released but not transposed. Five of the six patients had completely recovered after 0.5 to 4years follow-up. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow by the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is not common, but it must not be ignored. Only ultrasonography, MRI or, preferably, surgical exploration can establish the diagnosis. EMG findings such as reduced motor nerve conduction velocity in a short segment of the ulnar nerve provides evidence of anconeus epitrochlearis-induced neuropathy.
Purpose: To evaluate subjective and objective results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) combined with transfer of latissimus dorsi and teres major tendons (modified L’Episcopo transfer) in a large cohort and determine if postoperative improvements were maintained over time.
Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients were presented to our clinic with a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (CLEER) and were treated with a combined RSA and modified L’Episcopo transfer. Patients were prospectively followed on a yearly basis. Clinical evaluation and radiographic evaluation were obtained in all patients at each visit. Two patients were unable to return for follow-up, and 1 patient died. Follow-up averaged 44 months (range: 12–111). Thirty-six patients were presented with cuff tear arthropathy, 9 with a failed rotator cuff repair, 5 with a massive rotator cuff tear, 4 with a failed arthroplasty, and 2 with fracture sequelae.
Results: Two patients sustained traumatic tears of the transfer (1 following prosthetic instability and 1 following a periprosthetic fracture) and were excluded from the functional analysis. Combined with the three patients lost to follow-up, this left 54 total patients. Age at surgery was 70 years (range: 52–84). SSV was significantly improved from 29 % preoperatively to 72 % postoperatively. Forward flexion improved by an average of 53° and external rotation improved by 28° (−30–70°). The ADLER and adjusted Constant scores improved from 9 preoperatively to 25 postoperatively and from 44 % preoperatively to 88 % postoperatively, respectively, at most recent follow-up. Improvements were maintained over long-term follow-up. Forty-nine patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their surgical result, and 5 patients were disappointed.
Conclusion: Combined RSA with modified L’Episcopo transfer is an effective procedure for restoring forward elevation and external rotation in patients presenting with a combined deficit. Subjective and objective improvements are realized soon after surgery and are maintained with time.
Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is defined by dynamic, recurrent and symptomatic partial or total loss of posterior joint contact. Anatomic risk factors comprise ligament hyperlaxity, glenoid retroversion or dysplasia, and high horizontal acromial morphology. Associated anatomic lesions comprise labrum lesions, posterior glenoid erosion and/or fracture, and anterior humeral head notching. We distinguish two subcategories of PSI: functional and structural, respectively without and with anatomic lesions. In both categories, there may be anatomic risk factors. Clinically, functional PSI involves reproducible asymptomatic voluntary subluxation or sometimes reproducible involuntary subluxation. Functional PSI implicates impaired external-rotation rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer muscle activity. Treatment is non-operative, by rehabilitation and shoulder pace maker. Structural shoulder instability involves anatomic lesions, often due to iterative microtrauma; pain is the most frequent symptom. It usually concerns young athletic subjects, but the clinical forms of structural and of anterior shoulder instability are not superimposable. Treatment may be surgical; arthroscopic labrum repair is effective in the absence of significant bone lesions, whereas otherwise posterior bone block is the treatment of choice. Surgical treatment of scapular features underlying structural PSI is improved by 3D preoperative planning, cutting guides and dedicated internal fixation systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: expert opinion.
Background: We aim to analyze recurrence of dislocation after Latarjet bone block with or without Hill-Sachs Remplissage (HSR) to specify the indication of a combined procedure.
Methods: We analyzed 118 patients with a bipolar lesions and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. All procedures were performed arthroscopically by 3 surgeons in on center. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were collected. We also collected preoperative and postoperative clinical scores Two groups were identified: 30 patients with arthroscopic Latarjet bone block combined with a HSR (group I) and 88 patients with an isolated Latarjet (group II). Measurements were performed on a reformatted shoulder CT-scan. On preoperative CT-scans, we measured the glenoid bone loss, the width and the length of the humeral lesion then the glenoid track and Hill-Sachs interval.
Results: The mean follow-up is 6 years. Five dislocations occurred in group II, none in group I. The area of glenoid bone loss was higher in group I than in group II (33.4% ± 4.5% vs. 20.5% ± 8.9%, P = .001). Twenty shoulders presented an Off-Track lesion preoperatively that was always compensated postoperatively by the bone block in group I. No cutoff was found to be discriminating enough to help in the decision-making process. All recurrences had an Instability Severity Index score > 6.
Conclusion: No recurrence occurred in Group I. However, 5 patients (6%) in Group II experienced a recurrent dislocation with no significant difference. Glenoid track is not an isolated argument to indicate an isolated bone block procedure or a combined HSR. The risk of recurrence increases in patients with an Instability Severity Index score over 6 and in this case, a combine procedure should be recommended.
Preoperative CT measurements of distal radial inclination and volar tilt are useful for surgical planning, but current methods are time-consuming and user-dependent. This study validates an automated 3D measurement method for these measurements. We analysed 20 bilateral CT scans, including healthy and pathological sides with extra-articular malunions. Three senior observers performed manual measurements and an automated algorithm generated measurements based on the radiocarpal surface. Agreement between manual and automatic methods was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis, with acceptable agreement set at 5° for the coefficient of repeatability. Correction quantification accuracy was assessed by comparing each method to a reference method. The mean difference in radial inclination between the automatic and manual methods was -6° and for volar tilt was -2.6°. The automated method showed closer correction agreement with the reference, enhancing reproducibility and saving time in preoperative planning.Level of evidence: III.
Background: There are some major controversies surrounding the use and longevity of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA). The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term survival and outcomes (minimum 10-year) following PISA for osteoarthritis (OA) in young and active patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent PISA (InSpyre; Tornier-Stryker) for OA between 2009 and 2012. Arthroplasty survival was known for 71 patients followed longitudinally for a minimum of 10 years. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed in 62 patients (62 shoulders) reviewed with radiographs. The mean age at surgery was 60 years (range, 23-72 years), and 31 shoulders (50%) underwent prior surgery before PISA. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (POA = 29), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA = 23), and postinstability osterarthritis (PIOA = 10). Clinical failure was defined as repeat surgical intervention involving prosthesis revision. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The mean duration of follow-up was 11 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-14 years).
Results: Overall, the survival rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.8-96.8) at 5 years and 87% (95% CI 79-94.8) at a 10-year follow-up. Survival was 100% in PTOA (type 1 fracture sequelae) and in PIOA as well as 95% in primary OA with type A glenoid. Revision surgery was significantly higher in biconcave (type B2) glenoid (44%) compared with concentric (type A) glenoid (2%), respectively (P = .002). Among the 7 patients who were revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 5 had painful glenoid erosion and 2 had bipolar (glenoid and humeral) erosion with thinning and finally fracture of the greater tuberosity. Two shoulders with glenohumeral erosion were associated with secondary rotator cuff tears (1 supraspinatus and 1 subscapularis tear). The mean time to revision and revision was 4 ± 1.7 years. Glenoid wear was more often superior (81%) than central (19%), P < .001. For those shoulders not revised, the mean CS and SSV significantly increased from 39 ± 14 to 70 ± 14 points and 34% ± 15% to 75% ± 17%, respectively (P < .001).
Conclusion: PISA is an efficient and durable surgical procedure for the treatment of young and active patients with post-traumatic OA, postinstability OA, and primary OA with concentric (type A) glenoid erosion, but not for those with biconcave (type B2) glenoid. Biconcave (type B2) glenoid and subscapularis tear or insufficiency are risk factors for failure and revision.
Hypothesis: Chronic epilepsy may cause important bipolar bony lesions. We aim to compare the specific pathoanatomic metrics of the bony lesions in chronic shoulder anterior instability that occur in patients with epilepsy vs. patients without epilepsy.
Methods: From 2006 to 2020, we included epileptic and nonepileptic patients with anterior recurrent shoulder instability. We randomly adjusted the patients of the 2 groups according to the sex, age, and type of management. We included 50 patients. For each included patient, we performed an in-depth analysis and comparison of the glenoid bone loss based on the computed tomography scan: PICO method (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) using the best-fit circle; and the Hill-Sachs lesion: the depth and width were given as a percentage of the humeral head diameter on an axial view. We also evaluated the engaging character of the involved lesion using the on-track vs. off-track analysis. Those characteristics were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: We found a glenoid bone loss in 32 patients. Glenoid bone loss was not significantly greater in patients with epilepsy (P = .052). A Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 42 patients (22 in the group with epilepsy and 20 in the group without epilepsy). Hill-Sachs lesions were significantly deeper and larger in the group with epilepsy (depth: 22% vs. 9%, P < .001; width: 43% vs. 28%, P = .003). In the group with epilepsy, 90% of the bone lesions were off-track vs. 30% in the group without epilepsy. Thus, the patients with epilepsy presented more engaging bony lesions than patients without epilepsy (P = .001) (OR = 23).
Conclusions: In a population of patients with epilepsy who had shoulder instability, Hill-Sachs lesions are larger and deeper than in normal patients with shoulder instability. By contrast, there is no significant difference regarding the characteristics of the glenoid bone loss if present. This implies that bone lesions in instable shoulders of patients with epilepsy need at least a bony stabilization procedure on the humeral side in the majority of cases.
Keywords: Hill-Sachs, shoulder stabilization; Shoulder; anterior instability; bone lesion; epilepsy.
Background: Several studies have demonstrated the interest in patient-specific custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but clinical improvement remains debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes (Forgotten Joint Score, FJS) of patients undergoing individualized TKA compared with those receiving off-the-shelf (OTS) implants, both using patient-specific cutting guides with personalized alignment over a minimum follow up period of 12 months. We hypothesized that individualized TKA demonstrates significantly better functional outcomes than OTS TKA (FJS and percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference).
Methods: A continuous single-surgeon retrospective series was analyzed from September 2018 to June 2020. The inclusion criterion was primary TKA for osteoarthritis. The series compared 58 individualized TKAs to 54 standard implants, with personalized alignment, at a mean follow up of 25 (12-40) months. The two groups were comparable in gender, age, BMI, and preoperative deformity. Complications and revision procedures were recorded. The FJS, New IKS, and Oxford Knee Score were assessed at the last follow up, and the sensation of a forgotten knee was evaluated.
Results: One patient in each group required TKA revision. At last follow up, the individualized TKA group showed significantly better FJS (91 ± 14 vs. 81 ± 23, P = 0.01), satisfaction category in the IKS (36 ± 5 vs. 32 ± 8, P = 0.002), IKS function (83 ± 11 vs. 72 ± 21, P = 0.003) and Oxford scores (44 ± 5 vs. 39 ± 10, P = 0.005. There was no significant difference in the IKS objective score (88 ± 16 vs. 82 ± 2, P = 0.34). The sensation of a forgotten knee rate did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion: Individualized TKA leads to improved clinical outcomes significantly compared with OTS TKA, utilizing personalized alignment and patient-specific cutting guides. This combination of personalized factors and individualized TKA enhances the potential to tackle the challenges associated with TKA and improve functional results.
Keywords: Custom TKA; Off-the-shelf TKA; Personalized alignment; Total knee arthroplasty.
Background: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) calculation in patients with shoulder instability has a wide variability in methods and their reliability. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate a new semi-automated software developed to improve GBL calculation using a 3D imaging modeling (IODA-shoulder) and to compare the method to the PICO area method.
Patients and methods: A semi-automated software to assess GBL was preliminarily developed and validated on 7 fresh frozen specimens (scapulae with artificially created glenoid defect), using water displacement method. Afterwards, the software was retrospectively used on CT images of 20 patients affected by recurrent shoulder dislocation. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral dislocation, minimum 2 dislocation episodes. Exclusion criteria were bone reconstruction of the glenoid, failed shoulder stabilization, bilateral dislocation, shoulder arthritis. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of bilateral shoulder were retrieved for each patient. Two methods to determine GBL were compared. The PICO surface area method and the new IODA method. We assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the two methods with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Bland-Alman analysis, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).
Results: We did not find a statistically significant difference between the mean volumes calculated with PICO and IODA methods, respectively 914 vs. 815 mm3, p=0.155. The analysis carried out by using the traditional PICO method showed a lower concordance rate among four observers than the higher concordance found using IODA method, regardless of the size and the location of the defect. The ICC agreement with PICO was significantly lower than with IODA (0.76 vs. 0.97). We found a poor CCC with PICO (from 0.65 to 0.81) and a substantial one with IODA (from 0.96 to 0.98).
Discussion: The intra- and inter-rater reliability using IODA method is significantly better than PICO method. The assessment of GBL using IODA method is time saving, avoiding significant inter- and intra-observer variation, mainly due to individual skill and experience in the method.
Level of evidence: IV, experimental study.
Keywords: CT scan; Glenoid bone loss; Instability; Shoulder.
Background: The aim of this study was to define the variability of the scapulohumeral position during preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) acquisition and to evaluate its influence on angular lateralization and distalization measurements. We hypothesized that the preoperative resting arm position, in terms of humeral abduction, flexion and internal rotation, would vary significantly between patients and that this variability would influence the lateralization (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA).
Methods: We analyzed a prospectively collected database of preoperative de-identified CT scans from a single Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) planning system (Equinoxe, Exactech GPS, Blue-Ortho), including all cases with scapular and humeral segmentation. Validated three-dimensional (3D) bone models were used to compute and automatically position scapular and humeral landmarks. These included: the superior glenoid tubercle; the most lateral border of the acromion and the most lateral border of the greater tuberosity. The position of the humerus relative to the scapula was automatically calculated, allowing the angles of abduction, flexion and internal rotation of the scapulohumeral joint to be assessed. Additionally, the potential relationship between the body mass index (BMI) and the resting arm position was assessed. Finally, LSA and DSA were calculated. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the humeral position and the LSA and DSA.
Results: A total of 21,863 patients were included. Preoperative humeral positioning relative to the scapula showed a mean abduction of 10.3°±12.4 (-14.0°; 36.6°), mean flexion of 3.9°±8.9 (-16.0°; 26.1°) and mean internal rotation of 6.5°±18.9 (-41.4°; 48.9°). The preoperative median of LSA and DSA were 87.4°±14.3° and 43°±12.4, respectively. Among the independent variables, abduction showed the strongest negative correlation with LSA (β = -0.2998, p < 0.0001), followed by flexion (β = -0.04342, p < 0.0001). Internal rotation was positively correlated with LSA (β = 0.1229, p < 0.0001). For DSA, abduction had a weak positive influence (β = 0.04321, p < 0.0001), while flexion (β = -0.04302, p < 0.0001) and internal rotation (β = -0.04654, p < 0.0001) were negatively associated. Notably, a 10° variation in abduction, flexion or internal rotation led to a -3°, -0.4° and + 1.2° change in LSA, respectively, whereas DSA was minimally affected, with variations limited to + 0.4°, -0.4° and – 0.5°, respectively.
Conclusion: The resting arm position during preoperative CT scans varies significantly, potentially affecting the preoperative planning of TSA. The main findings of this study suggest that there exists a weak correlation between the initial scapulohumeral position and the LSA/DSA measurements.
Level of evidence: Level IV. Case series with no comparison group.
Keywords: Distalization shoulder angle; Lateralization shoulder angle; Planning software; Resting arm position; Scapulohumeral relative position; Shoulder arthritis; Total shoulder arthroplasty.
Introduction: Internal rotation with the elbow against the body (IR1) is a crucial functional range of motion of the shoulder for daily activities. Its restoration following prosthetic surgery, particularly after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, remains unsatisfactory and unresolved. In clinical practice, its assessment can be challenging and subject to variability depending on the examiner. One method for evaluating IR range of motion is to determine the highest vertebral level reached by the patient. The objective of this study was to analyze interobserver agreement for the assessment of internal rotation using this commonly employed method, which is also utilized in the calculation of the Constant score.
Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that IR1 measurement based on the highest vertebral level reached would demonstrate a high degree of interobserver agreement.
Materials and methods: A total of 285 photographs of healthy volunteers performing a IR1 movement, as instructed prior to image acquisition, were independently and blindly assessed by four experienced shoulder surgeons. The range of motion was classified into six levels: thigh, buttocks, lumbosacral junction, waist (L3), T12 vertebra, and interscapular region (T7). Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa, while pairwise agreement between raters was calculated using Cohen’s kappa.
Results: Overall interobserver agreement was strong (K = 0.7, p-value < 0.04). In the paired analysis using Cohen’s kappa, interobserver agreement was almost perfect between certain raters, with values reaching up to 0.89. Detailed kappa analysis showed almost perfect agreement for the IR1 levels corresponding to the thigh and the interscapular region (K = 0.91 and 0.85, respectively). Agreement was strong for the buttocks level (K = 0.66) and moderate for the intermediate levels (T12, L3, and the lumbosacral junction) with K values of 0.57, 0.47, and 0.53, respectively.
Discussion: The interobserver correlation for this method of assessing IR1 range of motion is strong, suggesting that evaluating IR1 based on the highest vertebral level reached is a reproducible method for clinical shoulder examination.
Purpose: One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty has the advantage of requiring a single hospital stay and a single anaesthesia. The topic has been little reported, unlike one stage bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty, which have demonstrated their interest. The aim of the present study was to determine peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality after this procedure. The study hypothesis was that peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty is low in selected patients and that satisfaction is high.
Methods: A single-centre retrospective study assessed peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-one patients, aged < 80 years, with ASA score ≤ 3, were consecutively operated on between 1999 and 2020. Indications comprised primary osteoarthritis, aseptic osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis, massive rotator cuff tear, and dislocation fracture, involving both shoulders.
Results: There were no early deaths. The complication rate was 10% (4/21 cases). No prosthesis dislocation or sepsis was reported. Mean blood loss was 145 ± 40 cc, mean surgery time 164 ± 63 min, and mean hospital stay five ± four days. Only one patient required postoperative transfusion. Functional results at six months showed significantly improved range of motion and good patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty was feasible in selected patients. Mortality was zero, and morbidity was low. Surgery time was reasonable and required no repositioning. Postoperative home help is indispensable for patient satisfaction during rehabilitation.
We report here a rare case of an acute peripheral nerve compression by pseudotumoral calcinosis (PCT) at the right elbow in a patient with severe tertiary hyperaparathyroidism. This complication required urgent multidisciplinary management. Surgical decompression by PCT resection enabled rapid motor and sensory recovery.
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning is increasingly used in orthopaedic surgery. Two-dimensional (2D) characterization of distal radial deformities remains inaccurate, and 3D planning requires a reliable reference frame at the wrist. We aim to evaluate the reliability of the determination of anatomical points placed manually on 3D models of the radius to determine which of those points allow reliable morphometric measurements.
Methods: Twenty-three radial scans were reconstructed in 3D. Five operators specialized in the upper limb manually positioned 8 anatomical points on each model. One of the operators repeated the operation 6 times. The anatomical points were based on previously published 3D models used for radial inclination and dorsopalmar tilt measurements. The repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements derived using this manual landmarking were calculated using different measurement methods based on the identified points. An error of ≤2° was considered clinically acceptable.
Results: This study of intraobserver and interobserver variability of the anatomic points allowed us to determine the least variable and most accurately defined points. The middle of the ulnar border of the radius, the radial styloid, and the midpoint of the ulnar incisura of the radius were the least variable. The palmar and dorsal ends of the ridge delineating the scaphoid and lunate facets were the most variable. Only 1 of the radial inclination measurement methods was clinically acceptable; the others had a repeatability and reproducibility limit of >2°, making those measurements clinically unacceptable.
Conclusions: The use of isolated points seems insufficient for the development of a wrist reference frame, especially for the purpose of measuring dorsopalmar tilt. If one concurs that an error of 2° is unacceptable for all distal radial measurements, then clinicians should avoid using 3D landmarked points, due to their unreliability, except for radial inclination measured using the radial styloid and the midpoint of the ulnar edge of the radius. A characterization of the wrist using 3D shapes that fit the articular surface of the radius should be considered.
Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
Grégoire Micicoi, Bernard de Geofroy, Julien Chamoux, Ammar Ghabi, Marc-Olivier Gauci, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez
Introduction: Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.
Hypothesis: Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.
Material and methods: This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative « hidden » blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.
Results: Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626±506mL versus PA: 1746±692mL (p=0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p=0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5±3.2 versus PA: 8.2±3.3 days (p=0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ=10.3±14.1minutes [p<0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p=0.03).
Conclusion: This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.
Level of proof: III, comparative study of continuous series.
Background: The etiology of humeral posterior subluxation remains unknown, and it has been hypothesized that horizontal muscle imbalance could cause this condition. The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of anterior-to-posterior rotator cuff and deltoid muscle volume as a function of humeral subluxation and glenoid morphology when analyzed as a continuous variable in arthritic shoulders.
Methods: In total, 333 computed tomography scans of shoulders (273 arthritic shoulders and 60 healthy controls) were included in this study and were segmented automatically. For each muscle, the volume of muscle fibers without intramuscular fat was measured. The ratio between the volume of the subscapularis and the volume of the infraspinatus plus teres minor (AP ratio) and the ratio between the anterior and posterior deltoids (APdeltoid) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether a correlation could be found between these ratios and glenoid version, humeral subluxation, and/or glenoid type per the Walch classification.
Results: Within the arthritic cohort, no statistically significant difference in the AP ratio was found between type A glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22) and type B glenoids (1.03 ± 0.16, P = .09), type D glenoids (1.12 ± 0.27, P = .77), or type C glenoids (1.10 ± 0.19, P > .999). No correlation was found between the AP ratio and glenoid version (ρ = -0.0360, P = .55) or humeral subluxation (ρ = 0.076, P = .21). The APdeltoid ratio of type A glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15) was significantly greater than that of type B glenoids (0.35 ± 0.16, P < .01) and type C glenoids (0.21 ± 0.10, P < .01) but was not significantly different from that of type D glenoids (0.64 ± 0.34, P > .999). When evaluating both healthy control and arthritic shoulders, moderate correlations were found between the APdeltoid ratio and both glenoid version (ρ = 0.55, P < .01) and humeral subluxation (ρ = -0.61, P < .01).
Conclusion: This in vitro study supports the use of software for fully automated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the 4 rotator cuff muscles and the deltoid. Compared with previous 2-dimensional computed tomography scan studies, our study did not find any correlation between the anteroposterior muscle volume ratio and glenoid parameters in arthritic shoulders. However, once deformity occurred, the observed APdeltoid ratio was lower with type B and C glenoids. These findings suggest that rotator cuff muscle imbalance may not be the precipitating etiology for the posterior humeral subluxation and secondary posterior glenoid erosion characteristic of Walch type B glenoids.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of changing humeral tray thickness on the resultant of intraoperative glenohumeral joint loads using a load-sensing system (LSS).
Methods: An rTSA was performed on fresh frozen full-body cadaver shoulders by using an internal proprietary LSS on the humeral side. The glenohumeral loads (Newtons) and the direction of the resultant force applied on the implant were recorded during four standard positions (External rotation, Extension, Abduction, Flexion) and three « complex » positions of Activity Daily Life (« behind back », « overhead reach » and « across chest »). For each position, the thickness was increased from 0 to 6 mm in a continuous fashion using the adjustment feature of the humeral system. Each manoeuvre was repeated three times.
Results: All shoulder positions showed a high repeatability of the glenohumeral load magnitude measured with an intra-class correlation coefficient of over 0.9. For each position, we observed a strong but no linear correlation between humeral tray thickness and joint loads. It was a cubical correlation (rs = 0,91) with a short ascending phase, then a plateau phase, and finally a phase with an exponential growth of the loads on the humeral implant. In addition, an increase in trail-poly thickness led to a recentering of force application at the interface of the two glenohumeral implants.
Conclusion: This study provides further insight into the effects of humeral implant thickness on rTSA glenohumeral joint loads during different positions of the arm. Data obtained using this type of device could guide surgeons in finding the proper implant balance during rTSA.
Background: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the lower limbs is a function-threatening event usually managed by extended dermofasciotomy. Closure of the skin may be delayed, creating a risk of complications when there is an underlying fracture. Early treatment at the pre-ACS stage might allow isolated fasciotomy with no skin incision. The primary objective of this study was to compare intracompartmental pressure (ICP) changes after fasciotomy and after dermofasciotomy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate potential associations linking the starting ICP to achievement of an ICP below the physiological cut-off of 10mm Hg and to determine whether the ICP changes after fasciotomy and dermofasciotomy varied across muscle compartments.
Hypothesis: Fasciotomy with no skin incision may not provide a sufficient ICP decrease, depending on the initial ICP value.
Material and methods: A previously validated model of cadaver ACS of the lower limbs was used. Saline was injected gradually to raise the ICP to>15mmHg (ICP15), >30mmHg (ICP30), and >50mmHg (ICP50). We studied 70 leg compartments (anterior, lateral, and superficial posterior) in 13 cadavers (mean age, 89.1±4.6years). ICP was monitored continuously. Percutaneous, minimally invasive fasciotomy consisting in one to three 1-cm incisions was performed in each compartment. ICP was measured before and after fasciotomy then after subsequent skin incision. The objective was to decrease the ICP below 10mmHg after fasciotomy or dermofasciotomy.
Results: Overall, mean ICP was 37.8±19.1mmHg after the injection of 184.0±133.01mL of saline. In the ICP15 group, the mean ICP of 16.1mmHg fell to 1.4mmHg after fasciotomy (ΔF=14.7) and 0.3mmHg after dermofasciotomy (ΔDF=1.1). Corresponding values in the ICP30 group were 33.9mmHg, 4.7mmHg (ΔF=29.2), and 1.2mmHg (ΔDF=3.5); and in the ICP50 group, 63.7mmHg, 17.0mmHg (ΔF=46.7), and 1.2mmHg (ΔDF=15.8). Thus, in the group with initial pressures >50mmHg, the ICP decrease was greater after both procedures, but fasciotomy alone nonetheless failed to achieve physiological values (<10mmHg). The pressure changes were not significantly associated with the compartment involved (anterior, lateral, or superficial posterior) (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, higher baseline ICPs were associated with larger ICP drops after fasciotomy and dermofasciotomy. Nevertheless, when the baseline ICP exceeded 50mmHg, fasciotomy alone failed to decrease the ICP below 10mmHg. Adding a skin incision achieved this goal.
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?
Marc-Olivier Gauci, Romain Ceccarelli, Vincent Lavoue, Mikael Chelli, Olivier A J van der Meijden, Jean-François Gonzalez, Pascal Boileau
Background: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with both excessive posterior humeral subluxation (PHS) and excessive glenoid retroversion in 40% of cases. These morphometric abnormalities are a particular issue because they may be responsible for a deterioration in long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a computed tomographic (CT) analysis of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with B2-, B3-, or C-type glenoids in whom an attempt was made to correct for excessive glenoid retroversion and excessive posterior humeral subluxation intraoperatively.
Material: We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 62 TSA patients with a preoperative PHS of the glenohumeral joint (31 men, 31 women, 70 ± 9 years) between January 2000 and January 2014. Glenoids were classified as B2 (32 cases), B3 (13 cases), or C (17 cases). Glenoid retroversion was corrected by anterior asymmetric reaming. Patients were reviewed for clinical and CT scan assessment with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years (minimum 5 years). At final follow-up, the CT images were reconstructed in the scapular plane. A PHS index >65% defined persistence.
Results: The revision-free rate was estimated at 93%. Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively (ρ = 0.58) and strong at final follow-up (ρ = 0.73). Postoperative CT scans on average showed a surgical correction of PHS compared to preoperatively (79% vs. 65% respectively, P < .05) and retroversion (20° vs. 10° respectively, P < .05). At final follow-up, 25 of 62 patients had a persistence in the 2-dimensional (2D) model and 41 of 62 in the corrected 2D model. Persistence of PHS had no influence on clinical outcomes but did demonstrate a significantly higher glenoid loosening rate (20% vs. 59%, P < .05).
Conclusion: Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively and strengthened at long-term follow-up. Anterior asymmetric reaming allowed for a surgical improvement of both PHS and retroversion, but it was not sufficient to maintain a correction over time. Glenoid loosening was more frequent in case of PHS persistence but seemingly without clinical relevance.
Keywords: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; B glenoid; biconcave glenoid; osteoarthritis; persistence; posterior humeral subluxation.
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 years of age: a multicenter retrospective study
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) offers promising functional outcomes for young patients, yet challenges persist in restoring internal rotation (IR). This study aimed to assess the restoration of IR after RSA in patients younger than 60 years of age and analyze the factors affecting IR recovery.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, examining the functional outcome of patients who underwent RSA, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Two subgroups of patients who underwent primary RSA were analyzed separately with respect to active internal rotation with the elbow at the side (AIR1): « difficult AIR1 » and « easy AIR1. »
Results: The study included 136 patients (overall series) with a mean age of 51.6 years. The overall series showed statistically significant improvement in active range of motion (RoM), pain, and Constant scores, especially with active IR (p < 0.01). According to etiology, statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in active IR was observed for fracture sequelae, primary osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, whereas no statistically significant improvement in IR was observed for tumor, revision, and cuff-tear arthropathy (p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with easy AIR1 displayed a statistically significant lower body mass index and better Constant score mobility, as well as improved motion in forward elevation and active IR (p < 0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between improved IR and prosthetic design or subscapularis repair. Scapular notch, lysis of the graft, and teres minor atrophy were significantly associated with better active IR (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: RSA improves active RoM, pain, and functional outcomes in patients aged under 60. However, the degree of improvement in IR may vary depending on several factors and the underlying etiologies. These insights are crucial for patient selection and counseling, guiding RSA optimization efforts.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Constant score; Internal rotation; Range of motion; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Young arthritis shoulder.
Neer’s classification for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) uses 10 mm and 45° thresholds to distinguish displaced fragments. While this system was originally developed referencing 2D X-rays, fracture displacements occur in three dimensions. Our work aimed to develop a standardized and reliable computerized method for measuring PHF 3D spatial displacements. CT scans of 77 PHFs were analyzed. A statistical shape model (SSM) was used to generate the pre-fracture humerus. This predicted proximal humerus was then used as a « layer » to manually reduce fragments to their native positions and quantify translation and rotation in three dimensions. 3D computerized measurements could be calculated for 96% of fractures and revealed that 47% of PHFs were displaced according to Neer’s criteria. Valgus and varus head rotations in the coronal plane were present in 39% and 45% of cases; these were greater than 45° in 8% of cases and were always associated with axial and sagittal rotations. When compared to 3D measurements, 2D methods underestimated the displacement of tuberosity fragments and did not accurately assess rotational displacements. The use of 3D measurements of fracture displacement is feasible with a computerized method and may help further refine PHF analysis and surgical planning.
Introduction: The etiology of humeral posterior subluxation remains unknown, and it has been hypothesized that horizontal muscle imbalance could cause this condition. The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of anterior to posterior rotator cuff muscle and deltoid volumes as a function of humeral subluxation and glenoid morphology when analyzed as continuous variable in arthritic shoulders.
Methods: Three hundred and thirty-three (273 arthritic and 60 healthy controls) CT scans of shoulders were included in this study and were segmented automatically. For each muscle, the volume of muscle fibers without intra-muscular fat was then measured. The ratio between the volume of the subscapularis and the volume of the infraspinatus + teres minor (AP ratio) and the ratio between the anterior and posterior deltoid (APdeltoid) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether a correlation could be found between these ratios and glenoid version/ humeral subluxation/glenoid type in the Walch classification.
Results: Within the arthritic cohort, no statistically significant difference was found between the AP ratio between A and type B glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.03 ± 0.16 p=0.09), between A and D type glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.12 ± 0.27, p=0.77) nor between the A and C type glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22 versus 1.10 ± 0.19, p=1). No correlation was found between AP ratio and glenoid version/humeral subluxation (rho =-0.0360, p=0.55; rho = 0.076; p=0.21). The APdeltoid ratio of type A glenoids was significantly greater than that of type B glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.35 ± 0.16, p< 0.01), and type C glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.21±0.10, p < 0.01) but not significantly different from the APdeltoid ratio of type D glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15 versus 0.64 ± 0.34, p=1). When evaluating both healthy control and arthritic shoulders, moderate correlations were found between APdeltoid ratio and glenoid version/humeral subluxation (rho=0.55, p<0.01; rho=-0.61, p<0.01).
Conclusion: As opposed to previous two-dimensional CT scan studies, we did not find any correlation between AP muscle volume ratio and glenoid parameters in arthritic shoulders. Therefore, rotator cuff muscle imbalance does not seem to be associated with posterior humeral subluxation leading to posterior glenoid erosion and subsequent retroversion characteristic of Walch B glenoids. However, our results could suggest that a larger posterior deltoid pulls the humerus posteriorly into posterior subluxation, but this requires further evaluation as the deltoid follows the humerus possibly leading to secondary asymmetry between the anterior and the posterior deltoid.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze the real range of motion (RoM) measured in patients operated on for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and compare it to the virtual RoM provided by the preoperative planning software.
Hypothesis: There was a difference between virtual and real RoM, which can be explained by different factors, specifically the scapula-thoracic (ST) joint.
Methods: Twenty patients with RSA were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Passive RoM in forward elevation abduction, without and with manually locking the ST joint, and in external rotation with arm at side were recorded. The humerus, scapula, and implants were manually segmented on post-operative CTs. Post-operative bony structures were registered to preoperative bony elements. From this registration, a post-operative plan corresponding to the real post-operative implant positioning was generated and the corresponding virtual RoM analysis was recorded. On the post-operative anteroposterior X-rays and 2D-CT coronal planning view, the glenoid horizontal line angle (GH), the metaphyseal horizontal line angle (MH), and the gleno-metaphyseal angle (GMA) were measured to assess the extrinsic glenoid inclination, as well as the relative position of the humeral and glenoid components.
Results: There were some significant differences between virtual and post-operative passive abduction and forward elevation, with (55° and 50°, p < 0.0001) or without ST joint participation (15° and 27°, p < 0.002). For external rotation with arm at side, there was no significant difference between planning (24° ± 26°) and post-operative clinical observation (19° ± 12°) (p = 0.38). For the angle measurements, the GMA was significantly higher (42.8° ± 15.2° vs. 29.1°± 18.2°, p < 0.0001), and the GH angle, significantly lower on the virtual planning (85.2° ± 8.8° vs. 99.5° ± 12.5°, p < 0.0001), while the MH was not different (p = 0.33).
Conclusions: The virtual RoM given by the planning software used in this study differs from the real post-operative passive RoM, except for external rotation. This can be explained by the lack of ST joint and soft tissues simulation. However, in focusing on the virtual GH participation, the simulation looks informative. Some modifications between the glenoid and humerus starting positions before running the motion analysis could be provided for making it more realistic and predictive of the RSA functional results.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: motion analysis; preoperative planning; range of motion; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; scapulothoracic joint; soft tissues.
Close
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Marc-Olivier Gauci, Manuel Olmos, Caroline Cointat, Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas, Manuel Urvoy, Albert Murienne, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez
Purpose: Clinical evaluation of the shoulder range of motion (RoM) may vary significantly depending on the surgeon. We aim to validate an automatic shoulder RoM measurement system associating image acquisition by an RGB-D (red/green/blue-depth) video camera to an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.
Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were included. A 3D RGB-D sensor that simultaneously generated a colour image and a depth map was used. Then, an open-access convolutional neural network algorithm that was programmed for shoulder recognition provided a 3D motion measure. Each volunteer adopted a randomized position successively. For each position, two observers made a visual (EyeREF) and goniometric measurement (GonioREF), blind to the automated software which was implemented by an orthopaedic surgeon. We evaluated the inter-tester intra-class correlation (ICC) between observers and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the three methods.
Results: For manual evaluations EyeREF and GonioREF, ICC remained constantly excellent for the widest motions in the vertical plane (i.e., abduction and flexion). It was very good for ER1 and IR2 and fairly good for adduction, extension, and ER2. Differences between the measurements’ means of EyeREF and shoulder RoM was significant for all motions. Compared to GonioREF, shoulder RoM provided similar results for abduction, adduction, and flexion and EyeREF provided similar results for adduction, ER1, and ER2. The three methods showed an overall good to excellent CCC. The mean bias between the three methods remained under 10° and clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: RGB-D/AI combination is reliable in measuring shoulder RoM in consultation, compared to classic goniometry and visual observation.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automatic clinical assessment; Goniometer comparison; Markerless sensor; Range of motion; Shoulder.
Background: Glomus tumors, also known as benign acral tumors are extremely rare. Previous glomus tumors from other regions of the body have been linked to neurological compression symptoms, however axillary compression at the scapular neck has never been described.
Case presentation: Here, we report a case of axillary nerve compression in a 47-year-old man, secondary to a glomus tumor of the neck of the right scapula, initially misdiagnosed with biceps tenodesis performed and no pain improvement. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a well-contoured, 12 mm tumefaction at the inferior pole of the scapular neck T2-hyperintense and T1-isointense and interpreted as a neuroma. An axillary approach allowed the dissection of the axillary nerve, and the tumor was completely removed. The pathological anatomical analysis resulted in a nodular red lesion measuring 14 × 10 mm, delimited and encapsulated with a definitive diagnostic of glomus tumor. The neurologic symptoms and pain disappeared 3 weeks after surgery and the patient reported satisfaction with the surgical procedure. After 3 months, the results remain stable with a complete resolution of the symptoms.
Conclusions: In cases of unexplained and atypical pain in the axillary area, and to avoid potential misdiagnoses and inappropriate treatments, an in-depth exploration for a compressive tumor should be performed as a differential diagnosis.
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence
Purpose: Clinical evaluation of the shoulder range of motion (RoM) may vary significantly depending on the surgeon. We aim to validate an automatic shoulder RoM measurement system associating image acquisition by an RGB-D (red/green/blue-depth) video camera to an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.
Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were included. A 3D RGB-D sensor that simultaneously generated a colour image and a depth map was used. Then, an open-access convolutional neural network algorithm that was programmed for shoulder recognition provided a 3D motion measure. Each volunteer adopted a randomized position successively. For each position, two observers made a visual (EyeREF) and goniometric measurement (GonioREF), blind to the automated software which was implemented by an orthopaedic surgeon. We evaluated the inter-tester intra-class correlation (ICC) between observers and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the three methods.
Results: For manual evaluations EyeREF and GonioREF, ICC remained constantly excellent for the widest motions in the vertical plane (i.e., abduction and flexion). It was very good for ER1 and IR2 and fairly good for adduction, extension, and ER2. Differences between the measurements’ means of EyeREF and shoulder RoM was significant for all motions. Compared to GonioREF, shoulder RoM provided similar results for abduction, adduction, and flexion and EyeREF provided similar results for adduction, ER1, and ER2. The three methods showed an overall good to excellent CCC. The mean bias between the three methods remained under 10° and clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: RGB-D/AI combination is reliable in measuring shoulder RoM in consultation, compared to classic goniometry and visual observation.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automatic clinical assessment; Goniometer comparison; Markerless sensor; Range of motion; Shoulder.
Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up
Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up
Background: Various implant designs have been proposed to increase active range of motion (ROM) and avoid notching in patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an onlay prosthesis design combining a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle with the glenoid component lateralized and inferiorized.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted of the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up (≥24 months) of all RSAs performed by the same surgeon between September 2015 and December 2016 in the study center. At the last follow-up, patients were clinically assessed for ROM, Constant score, and subjective shoulder value and radiologically for scapular notching and glenoid radiolucent lines. Patients were followed up radiographically at 1 month and clinically at between 6 and 12 months (midterm) and again at between 24 and 48 months (final follow-up). Scapular notching was graded as per the Sirveaux classification at the last follow-up on anterior-posterior radiographs.
Results: Seventy-nine RSAs were included with a mean follow-up time of 31 months. The mean Constant score at the final follow-up was 42 points higher than before surgery (69 vs. 27, P < .001). There were also significant postoperative improvements in ROM (active anterior elevation, active external rotation, and active internal rotation). The final means for motions were 133° for active anterior elevation, 32° active external rotation, and level 7 for active internal rotation. The overall notching rate was 3% (2/67), and there were no cases of severe notching. Radiolucent lines were observed in 8 of 70 prostheses (11.5%) around the peg, and they were observed in 9 prostheses (13%) around the screws. Among the 79 RSAs included, there were 11 complications (13.9%) (two infections, two fractures, four cases of glenoid component loosening, and three cases of instability), 2 reoperations, and 4 prosthesis revisions.
Conclusion: This study shows that an RSA design with a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle and an inferiorized and lateralized glenoid component is associated with significant improvements in active ROM, especially in rotation, and a low notching rate. However, rates of 3.8% for dislocation and 5% for glenoid loosening are certainly a concern at such a short follow-up of two years. Future studies with a larger population are needed to confirm these rates.
Background: Variations in humeral component designs in hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty cases can impact the degree of difficulty during a revision surgery that necessitates the removal of the humeral stem. However, no metric exists to define stem extraction effort nor to identify associated factors that contribute to extraction difficulty. The purpose of this study is to describe a method to quantify stem extraction difficulty and to define features that will impact the effort during stem removal.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of 58 patients undergoing revision of hemiarthroplasty or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty requiring stem extraction. Each included patient had existing preoperative radiographic examination, an intraoperative video of the stem removal process, and explants available for analysis by 3 surgeons. The following factors were assessed for the impact on extraction difficulty: (1) preoperative features such as cement use, fill of proximal humerus, and stem design features; (2) intraoperative data on extraction time and bone removal; and (3) postoperative findings related to extraction artifacts (EAs). A scoring system was established to distinguish easy (Easy group) and difficult (Difficult group) stem removal cases and further used to identify the features that may affect intraoperative difficulty of stem removal.
Results: The Difficult group accounted for 26% (15/58) of the study population with an 18-minute average stem extraction time, average EA count of 69, and 35 mm of bone removed. The Easy group accounted for 74% (43/58) of patients, with a 4-minute average extraction time, average EA count of 23, and 10 mm of bone removed. Logistic regression model was able to correctly classify 82% of the cases, explaining 26.7% of the variance in humeral stem removal with cement and proximal coating variables. The likelihood of cemented stem removal being difficult is 5 times greater compared to an uncemented stem, and having proximal coating doubles the likelihood of a difficult stem removal compared to cases with no coating.
Conclusions: Quantifying stem extraction difficulty is possible with intraoperative video as well as explant analysis. Preoperative features of the fixation type and specific features of stem design such as proximal coating will impact difficulty of stem extraction.
The interest of patient-specific guides (PSGs) lies in reliable intraoperative achievement of preoperative planning goals. They are a form of instrumentation optimizing intraoperative precision and thus improving the safety and reproducibility of surgical procedures. Clinical superiority, however, has not been demonstrated. The various steps from design to implementation leave room for error, which needs to be known and controlled by the surgeon who is responsible for final outcome. Instituting large-scale patient-specific surgery requires management systems for guides and innovative implants which cannot be a simple extension of current practices. We shall approach the present state of knowledge regarding PSGs via 5 questions: (1) What is a PSG? Single-use instrumentation produced after preoperative planning, aiming exclusively to optimize procedural exactness. (2) How to use and assess PSGs in orthopedic surgery? Strict rules of use must be adhered to. Any deviation from the predefined objective is, necessarily, an error that must be identified as such. (3) Do PSGs provide greater surgical exactness? The contribution of PSGs varies greatly between procedures. Exactness is enhanced in the spine, in osteotomies around the knee and in bone-tumor surgery. In the shoulder, their contribution is seen only in complex cases. Data are sparse for hip replacement, and controversial for knee replacement. (4) What are the expected benefits of PSGs? As well as improving exactness, PSGs allow a lower radiation dose and shorter operating time. They also enable junior surgeons to train in techniques otherwise reserved to hyperspecialists. (5) How to include PSGs in everyday practice? As well as their potential clinical interest, PSGs involve deep changes in organization, equipment provision and economic model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.
Keywords: 3D printing; CAOS; Patient-specific guides; Planning; Precision.
Background: Glomus tumors, also known as benign acral tumors are extremely rare. Previous glomus tumors from other regions of the body have been linked to neurological compression symptoms, however axillary compression at the scapular neck has never been described.
Case presentation: Here, we report a case of axillary nerve compression in a 47-year-old man, secondary to a glomus tumor of the neck of the right scapula, initially misdiagnosed with biceps tenodesis performed and no pain improvement. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a well-contoured, 12 mm tumefaction at the inferior pole of the scapular neck T2-hyperintense and T1-isointense and interpreted as a neuroma. An axillary approach allowed the dissection of the axillary nerve, and the tumor was completely removed. The pathological anatomical analysis resulted in a nodular red lesion measuring 14 × 10 mm, delimited and encapsulated with a definitive diagnostic of glomus tumor. The neurologic symptoms and pain disappeared 3 weeks after surgery and the patient reported satisfaction with the surgical procedure. After 3 months, the results remain stable with a complete resolution of the symptoms.
Conclusions: In cases of unexplained and atypical pain in the axillary area, and to avoid potential misdiagnoses and inappropriate treatments, an in-depth exploration for a compressive tumor should be performed as a differential diagnosis.
Introduction: In the context of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, some parameters of glenoid baseplate placement follow established golden rules, while other parameters still have no consensus. The assessment of glenoid wear in the future location of the glenoid baseplate varies among surgeons. The objective of this study was to analyze the inter-observer reproducibility of glenoid baseplate 3D positioning during virtual pre-operative planning.
Method: Four shoulder surgeons planned the glenoid baseplate position of a reverse arthroplasty in the CT scans of 30 degenerative shoulders. The position of the glenoid guide pin entry point and the glenoid baseplate center was compared between surgeons. The baseplate’s version and inclination were also analyzed.
Results: The 3D positioning of the pin entry point was achieved within ± 4 mm for nearly 100% of the shoulders. The superoinferior, anteroposterior and mediolateral positions of the baseplate center were achieved within ± 2 mm for 77.2%, 67.8% and 39.4% of the plans, respectively. The 3D orientation of the glenoid baseplate within ± 10° was inconsistent between the four surgeons (weak agreement, K=0.31, p=0.17).
Discussion: The placement of the glenoid guide pin was very consistent between surgeons. Conversely, there was little agreement on the lateralization, version and inclination criteria for positioning the glenoid baseplate between surgeons. These parameters need to be studied further in clinical practice to establish golden rules. Three-dimensional information from pre-operative planning is beneficial for assessing the glenoid deformity and for limiting its impact on the baseplate position achieved by different surgeons.
Background: Several studies have already reported good short-term results with a pyrocarbon unipolar radial head prosthesis (Pyc-uRHP). The aim was to evaluate the evolution from mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a Pyc-uRHP.
Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study. We followed up all the patients who underwent Pyc-uRHP surgery in our original study at 2 years of follow-up (52 patients), reaching a minimum of 7 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. This study included 26 patients who underwent a clinical examination assessing mobility, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the visual analog scale score and radiologic evaluation with anteroposterior and profile radiographs at a mean follow-up of 110 months (range, 78-162 months). The radiologic study analyzed signs of proximal osteolysis, stem loosening, capitellar wear, and humeroulnar osteoarthritis.
Results: No patients required revision. Eight patients required reoperation: coronoid screw removal in 1 and arthrolysis for stiffness in 7. The mean time to reoperation was 11 months. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score at last follow-up was 96 ± 9 (of 100), with a pain score of 42 ± 7 (of 45), mobility score of 19 ± 2 (of 20), stability score of 10 (of 10), and function score of 25 (of 25). Comparison with clinical data from the mid-term delay did not reveal any significant difference. All patients presented with proximal osteolysis around the neck but without progression. No stem loosening was noted. The rates of humeroulnar osteoarthritis (12% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P < .0001) and capitellar lesions (34% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P = .001) increased significantly.
Conclusion: We have shown that a Pyc-uRHP at 9 years’ follow-up provided stable and satisfactory clinical results. Osteolysis of the radial neck was always present but it did not evolve, and no stem loosening was noted. Finally, we have shown a clear worsening of radiologic humeroulnar osteoarthritis and capitellar lesions that remained asymptomatic.
Keywords: Elbow; arthritis; injury; osteolysis; prosthesis; radial head fracture; sequelae.
We retrospectively compared results of 27 wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis with mean follow-up of 67 months to 28 wrists with three-corner arthrodesis adding triquetral excision with mean follow-up of 74 months in 54 patients (55 wrists). Minimal follow-up was 2 years for all patients. Capitolunate nonunion occurred in three wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis and six wrists with three-corner arthrodesis, and radiolunate arthritis developed in four wrists with three-corner arthrodesis. Among patients with bicolumnar arthrodesis, hamatolunate arthritis occurred in seven wrists, all with a Viegas type II lunate; and pisotriquetral arthritis occurred in three wrists. At mean 5 years after surgery, 45 wrists had not needed revision surgery, and both groups had similar revision rates. The wrists with three-corner arthrodesis and bicolumnar arthrodesis had similar functional outcomes, and range of wrist motion was not significantly different between the two groups. We concluded that bicolumnar arthrodesis results in greater longevity than three-corner arthrodesis for a type I lunate. We do not recommend bicolumnar arthrodesis for type II lunate. We also concluded that three-corner arthrodesis has a greater incidence of radiolunate arthritis and capitolunate nonunion.
Volar plating is one of the most used surgical treatments for dorsally displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures. However, the reduction of the dorsal tilt can be difficult. It usually requires a flexion maneuver of the wrist while maintaining and screwing the plate, which is cumbersome. Plate positioning also is a crucial step and is sometimes difficult because of the large size of the plate relative to the width of the distal radius. We use an epiphysis-first technique. We place all the epiphyseal screws before reduction, and then we take advantage of the anatomical shape of a locking plate to automatically reduce the dorsal tilt by fixing the proximal radius to the plate with cortical compression screws. To ensure easy and accurate positioning of the plate, we drill a distal medial pilot hole in a free-hand fashion 10 mm proximal to the watershed line and 10 mm lateral to the medial rim of the radius, without positioning the plate. This allows a clear view of the location of this first hole. The locking plate is then applied to the distal radius with help of a monocortical non-locking screw, and it is controlled under fluoroscopy. When this medial pilot hole is properly positioned and the plate correctly tilted on the anteroposterior view, the remaining epiphyseal holes are filled with locking screws. Then the plate is fixed on the proximal radius with bicortical compression screws, allowing an automatic reduction of the epiphyseal dorsal tilt. We believe this technique is a safe and reproducible way to position volar plates and to reduce anatomically the dorsal tilt in extra-articular posteriorly displaced distal radius fractures (AO A2 and A3). Furthermore, the automatic fracture reduction provided by this technique decreases operation time and radiation.
Background: Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (STA) has been proposed for the treatment of painful scapular winging in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). However, the rate of osseous fusion is variable, and there is a theoretical risk of reduced respiratory function after bilateral STA.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 10 STAs, performed sequentially, in 5 FSHD patients. The surgical technique involved use of a semitubular plate and wire construct with autograft (iliac crest) interposed between the scapula and rib cage. Osseous fusion, respiratory function, and shoulder function were evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 141 ± 67 months (range, 24-225 months).
Results: Early complications included 1 pneumothorax and 1 pleural effusion. No late complications occurred, and no patients underwent reoperation. On postoperative computed tomography images, complete bony union of the scapula to the ribs was observed in 90% of shoulders (9 of 10). Comparison of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function test results showed no significant difference in vital capacity (from 87% ± 14% to 85% ± 12%) and forced vital capacity (from 86% ± 16% to 77% ± 15%). Patients gained on average 40° of active forward elevation (from 62° ± 20° to 102° ± 4°) and 22° of abduction (from 58° ± 21° to 89° ± 7°) (P < .001). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 25% ± 8% to 72% ± 18% (P < .001). All patients were pleased with the results and would recommend the procedure to other persons.
Conclusion: In patients with FSHD, bilateral STA provides satisfactory shoulder function with a high rate of scapulothoracic fusion and few or no significant respiratory repercussions.
Background: Our aim was to analyze the epidemiology, etiologies, and revision options for failed shoulder arthroplasty from 2 tertiary centers.
Methods: From 1993 to 2013, 542 failed arthroplasties were revised in 540 patients (65% women): 224 hemiarthroplasties (HAs, 41%), 237 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs, 44%) and 81 reverse total arthroplasties (RSAs, 15%). Data about patients, pathology, and reintervention procedures, as well as intraoperative data, were analyzed from our 2 local registries that prospectively captured all the revision procedures. Patients had an average follow-up period of 8.7 years.
Results: The revision rate was 12.7% for HAs, 6.7% for TSAs, and 3.9% for RSAs. HAs were revised earlier (33 ± 40 months) than RSAs (47 ± 150 months) and TSAs (69 ± 61 months). Glenoid failure was a major cause of reintervention: erosion in HAs (29%) or loosening in TSAs (37%) and RSAs (24%). Instability was another major cause of reintervention: 32% in RSAs, 20% in TSAs, and 13% in HAs. Humeral implant loosening led to revision in 10% of RSAs, 6% of HAs, and 6% of TSAs. Multiple reinterventions were required in 21% of patients, mainly for instability (26%) and/or infection (25%). The final implant was an RSA in 48%, especially when associated with cuff insufficiency, instability, and/or bone loss. Final reimplantation was possible in 90% of cases, with the remaining 10% treated with a resection or spacer.
Conclusion: Glenoid failure and instability are the most common causes of revision. Soft-tissue insufficiency and/or infection results in multiple revisions. Surgeons must recognize all complications so that they can be addressed at the first revision operation and avoid further reinterventions. RSA was the most common final revision implant.
Introduction: Antegrade percutaneous intra-medullary nailing (IMN) has a poor reputation in the treatment of humerus fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after IMN in humerus fracture.
Hypothesis: Third-generation humeral nails (straight, small diameter, with locked screws) conserve rotator cuff tendon integrity and avoid the shoulder stiffness and pain incurred by 1st generation (large diameter, without self-blocking screw) and 2nd generation nails (curved, penetrating the supraspinatus insertion on the greater tuberosity).
Methods: Forty patients (26 female, 14 male; mean age, 60 years (range, 20-89 years)) with displaced humeral fracture (23 proximal humerus, 17 humeral shaft) underwent IMN using a 3rd generation nail (34 Aequalis™ (Tornier-Wright), 6 MultiLoc™ (Depuy-Synthes)). Mean clinical, radiologic and ultrasound follow-up was 8 months (range, 6-18 months); 22 patients agreed to postoperative CT scan.
Results: There were no revision surgeries for rotator cuff repair or secondary bone displacement. Mean Adjusted Constant Score (ACS) was 93±22% and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) 77±18%. Elevation was 140±36°, external rotation 48±22° and internal rotation was to L3. Ultrasound found: 5 supraspinatus tendon lesions (12.5%) (2 full and 3 deep partial tears) without functional impact (ACS) 91% without vs. 107% with tear; (p=0.12); 2 of the deep partial tears involved excessively lateral and high nail positioning. Eight patients (20%) had painful tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon associated with significantly impaired functional scores (ACS 65% vs. 100%; p<0.001); and 4 cases of technical error: 3 of anterior LHB screwing in the groove, and 1 of LHB irritation due to an excessively long posterior screw.
Conclusion: Supraspinatus tendon lesions following IMN with a 3rd-generation humeral nail were rare (12.5%) and asymptomatic; prevalence was not higher than in the general population in the literature (16%). LHB tendinopathy was frequent (20%) and symptomatic, and due to technical error in half of the cases.
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is offered to young patients with a failed previous arthroplasty or a cuff-deficient shoulder, but the overall results are still uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to report the midterm outcomes and complications of RSA in patients younger than 65 years.
Methods: A search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases identified clinical studies reporting the results, at a minimum 2-year follow-up, of patients younger than 65 years treated with an RSA. The methodologic quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score by 2 independent reviewers. Complications, reoperations, range of motion, functional scores, and radiologic outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Eight articles were included, with a total of 417 patients. The mean age at surgery was 56 years (range, 21-65 years). RSA was used as a primary arthroplasty in 79% of cases and revision of a failed arthroplasty in 21%. In primary cases, the indications were cuff tear arthropathy and/or massive irreparable cuff tear in 72% of cases. The overall complication rate was 17% (range, 7%-38%), with the most common complications being instability (5%) and infection (4%). The reintervention rate was 10% at 4 years, with implant revision in 7% of cases. The mean weighted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, active forward elevation, and external rotation were 64 points, 121°, and 29°, respectively.
Conclusions: RSA provides reliable clinical improvements in patients younger than 65 years with a cuff-deficient shoulder or failed arthroplasty. The complication and revision rates are comparable to those in older patients.
Background: We evaluated survival and midterm results of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) in arthritic patients younger than 65 years.
Methods: Fifty-eight PISAs (InSpyre; Tornier-Wright, Bloomington, MN, USA), implanted in 56 patients between 2010 and 2015, were prospectively observed. The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 13 years. The cause was primary osteoarthritis (18), fracture sequelae (16), post-instability arthritis (15), aseptic necrosis (3), inflammatory disease (2), and failed hemiarthroplasty (4); 34 shoulders (61%) had previously undergone surgery. Glenoid erosion was assessed in 4 grades according to the Sperling classification. Humeral erosion was also assessed in 4 grades. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predisposing risk factors for both humeral and glenoid erosion.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 47 ± 15 months, survival rate was 90%. Six patients (10%) required conversion to reverse total shoulder prosthesis for painful glenoid erosion (n = 2) and humeral erosion with greater tuberosity stress fractures (n = 4). The mean Constant score and subjective shoulder value significantly increased from 36 ± 14 points to 70 ± 15 points and 32% ± 14% to 75% ± 19%, respectively (P < .001). Humeral medialization was observed in 78% of the cases with increased pain score. Uncorrected anteroposterior implant subluxation (12 cases) was associated with lower Constant score (50 points vs. 72 points; P = .02) and lower subjective shoulder value (53% vs. 78%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, no risk factors for glenoid or humeral erosion were found.
Conclusion: At midterm follow-up, PISA does not protect from progressive glenoid erosion and can lead to greater tuberosity erosion and stress fractures. Longer follow-up is required to see whether PISA survival will be superior to that of hemiarthroplasty.
Background: Avoiding superior inclination of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is crucial. We hypothesized that superior inclination was underestimated in RSA. Our purpose was to describe and assess a new measurement of inclination for the inferior portion of the glenoid (where the baseplate rests).
Methods: The study included 47 shoulders with rotator cuff tear arthropathy (mean age, 76 years). The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle), defined as the angle between the inferior part of the glenoid fossa and the perpendicular to the floor of the supraspinatus, was compared with the global glenoid inclination (β angle or total shoulder arthroplasty [TSA] angle). Measurements were made on plain anteroposterior radiographs and reformatted 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans by 3 independent observers and compared with 3-dimensional (3D) software (Glenosys) measurements.
Results: The mean RSA angle was 25° ± 8° on plain radiographs, 20° ± 6° on reformatted 2D CT scans, and 21° ± 5° via 3D reconstruction software. The mean TSA angle was on average 10° ± 5° lower than the mean RSA angle (P < .001); this difference was observed regardless of the method of measurement (radiographs, 2D CT, or 3D CT) and type of glenoid erosion according to Favard. In Favard type E1 glenoids with central concentric erosion, the difference between the 2 angles was 12° ± 4° (P < .001).
Conclusion: The same angle cannot be used to measure glenoid inclination in anatomic and reverse prostheses. The TSA (or β) angle underestimates the superior orientation of the reverse baseplate in RSA. The RSA angle (20° ± 5°) needs to be corrected to achieve neutral inclination of the baseplate (RSA angle = 0°). Surgeons should be aware that E1 glenoids (with central erosion) are at risk for baseplate superior tilt if the RSA angle is not corrected.
Background: The Walch classification describes glenoid morphology in primary arthritis. As knowledge grows, several modifications to the classification have been proposed. The type D, a recent modification, was defined as an anteverted glenoid with or without anterior subluxation. Literature on the anteverted glenoid in primary osteoarthritis is limited. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to analyze the anatomic characteristics of the type D glenoid on radiographs and computed tomography (CT).
Methods: The shoulder arthroplasty databases from 3 institutions were examined to identify patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and glenoid anteversion (≥5°), with or without anterior subluxation. The type D study cohort consisted of 18 patients (3% of the osteoarthritis cohort) and was a mean of 70 years old, with 11 women and 7 men. All radiographs were reviewed, and computed tomography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA) data were analyzed on validated 3-dimensional imaging software. Rotator cuff fatty infiltration, glenoid measurements (anteversion and inclination), and humeral head subluxation according to the scapular plane were determined.
Results: In the study cohort, the mean glenoid anteversion was 12° (range, 5°-24°), the mean inclination was 0°, and the mean anterior subluxation was 38% (range, 6%-56%). Eight patients (44%) had a biconcave glenoid with a posterosuperiorly positioned paleoglenoid and an anteroinferiorly positioned neoglenoid, and 10 patients had a monoconcave glenoid. Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles never exceeded Goutallier stage 2.
Conclusion: The type D glenoid is an addition to the original Walch classification and is characterized by glenoid anteversion (≥5°), anteroinferior humeral head subluxation, and absence of severe subscapularis fatty infiltration.
Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients
Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients
Introduction: Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures is recommended in an active population to avoid loss of strength, especially in supination and flexion.
Hypothesis: A double incision repair technique with immediate postoperative mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures is safe and provides good results after 2 years in active patients.
Material and methods: Seventy-four men (47±7 years) with acute tears of the distal biceps tendon tears were included in this retrospective single-center study. All patients were operated using the double-incision repair technique described by Morrey. The tendon was inserted with transosseous sutures into the biceps tuberosity. Patients were allowed to perform immediate postoperative active mobilization. A minimum follow-up of two years was required including clinical and radiological evaluation.
Results: Sixteen patients were lost to follow up leaving 58 (78%) patients for analysis with a mean follow-up of 53±19 months. At final follow-up, the mean evaluation for pain on the VAS scale was 0.22±0.7. Mean range of motion results included extension -1°±2°, flexion 138°±6°, pronation 72°±16° and supination 81°±10°. The strength ratio in flexion was 94±8% and in supination 90.5±12% compared to the contralateral limb. Subjective elbow value and DASH score were respectively 94±6% and 7.5±9%. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied and all except one returned to their previous sport. We noticed 2 heterotopic ossifications and one patient needed a reoperation for a radioulnar synostosis. Neither re-rupture nor nerve injury were observed.
Discussion: A double incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair is a minimally invasive procedure with reliable results. Morrey’s modification of the initial procedure associated with early mobilization is associated with a low rate of complications and limited the occurrence of synostosis or ossifications.
Level of evidence: IV, case series, with no comparison group.
Keywords: Distal biceps tear; Double incision technique; Early mobilisation; No nerve palsy.
Aims: The Walch Type C dysplastic glenoid is characterized by excessive retroversion. This anatomical study describes its morphology.
Patients and methods: A total of 29 shoulders with a dysplastic glenoid were analyzed. CT was used to measure retroversion, inclination, height, width, radius-of-curvature, surface area, depth, subluxation of the humeral head and the Goutallier classification of fatty infiltration. The severity of dysplasia and deficiency of the posterior rim of the glenoid were recorded.
Results: A type C glenoid occurred in 1.8% of shoulders referred to our tertiary centres. The mean retroversion, inclination, height, width, radius-of-curvature, surface area, and depth of the glenoid were 37°, 3°, 46 mm, 30 mm, 37°, 1284 mm3, and 16 mm, respectively. The mean posterior subluxation was 90%. The Goutallier class was < 2 in 25 shoulders (86%). Glenoid dysplasia was mild in four, moderate in 14, and severe in 11 shoulders. The typical appearance of the posterior glenoid rim had a rounded or ‘lazy J’ morphology. The glenoid neck was deficient in 18 shoulders (62%).
Conclusion: A dysplastic Type C glenoid characteristically has a uniconcave retroverted morphology, a deficient posteroinferior rim and scapular neck, and a reduced depth. These findings help to define the unique anatomical variations and may aid the planning of surgery and the development of components for these patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1074-9.
Background: The MoPyC implant is an uncemented long-stemmed radial head prosthesis that obtains primary press-fit fixation via controlled expansion of the stem. Current literature regarding MoPyC implants appears promising; however, sample sizes in these studies are small. Our primary objective was to evaluate the short- to midterm clinical outcomes of a large sample of the MoPyC prostheses. The secondary objective was to determine the reasons for failure of the MoPyC devices.
Methods: Four electronic databases were queried for literature published between January 2000 and March 2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as reasons for reoperation were included. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), radiographic outcome, and reason for failure.
Results: A total of five articles describing 171 patients (82 males) with MoPyC implants were included. Mean patient age and follow-up were 52 years (18-79) and 3.1 years (1-9), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (MEPS > 74) in 157 patients. Overall complication rate was low (n = 22), while periprosthetic osteolysis was reported in 78 patients. Nineteen patients returned to the operating room, with implant revision being required in ten patients. The two primary reasons for failure were (intra-)prosthetic dislocation (n = 8) followed by stiffness (n = 7); no painful loosening was described.
Conclusion: Short- to midterm outcomes of MoPyC prostheses are satisfactory and complications associated are low. The use of stem auto-expansion as a mode of obtaining primary fixation in radial head arthroplasty appears to be an effective solution for reducing the risk of painful loosening.
Keywords: Auto-expandable stem; Failure; MoPyC; Outcomes; Radial head arthroplasty; Radial head prosthesis; Survival.
Close
Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty
Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty
Purpose: Glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is influenced by the position of the glenoid component. 3D planning software and patient-specific guides seem to improve positioning accuracy, but their respective individual application and role are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of freehand implantation after 3D pre-operative planning and to compare its accuracy to that of a targeting guide.
Method: Seventeen patients scheduled for TSA for primary glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in this prospective study. Every patient had pre-operative planning, based on a CT scan. Glenoid component implantation was performed freehand, guided by 3D views displayed in the operating room. The position of the glenoid component was determined by manual segmentation of post-operative CT scans and compared to the planned position. The results were compared to those obtained in a previous work with the use of a patient-specific guide.
Results: The mean error for the central point was 2.89 mm (SD ± 1.36) with the freehand method versus 2.1 mm (SD ± 0.86) with use of a targeting guide (p = 0.05). The observed difference was more significant (p = 0.03) for more severely retroverted glenoids (> 10°). The mean errors for version and inclination were respectively 4.82° (SD ± 3.12) and 4.2° (SD ± 2.14) with freehand method, compared to 4.87° (SD ± 3.61) and 4.39° (SD ± 3.36) with a targeting guide (p = 0.97 and 0.85, respectively).
Conclusion: 3D pre-operative planning allowed accurate glenoid component positioning with a freehand method. Compared to the freehand method, patient-specific guides slightly improved the position of the central point, especially for severely retroverted glenoids, but not the orientation of the component.
Keywords: 3D planning; Accuracy; Glenoid component; Patient-specific guides; Positioning; Total shoulder arthroplasty.
Close
The CJOrtho app: A mobile clinical and educational tool for orthopedics
The CJOrtho app: A mobile clinical and educational tool for orthopedics
The need for modern patient evaluation tools continues to grow. A dependable and reproducible assessment provides objective follow-up and increases the validity of collected data. This is where mobile apps come into play, as they provide a link between surgeons and patients. They also open the possibility of interacting with other healthcare staff to exchange common scientific reference systems and databases. The CJOrtho app provides fast access to 65 classification systems in orthopedics or trauma surgery, 20 clinical outcome scores and a digital goniometer. The development of free mobile apps is an opportunity for education and better follow-up, while meeting the demands of patients.
Keywords: Classifications; Clinical scores; Goniometer; Mobile app.
Aims: Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed glenoid components.
Materials and methods: A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs, 46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23 were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender, preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3 years (5 to 12, sd 26) postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision as the endpoint.
Results: A total of 26 shoulders (38%) underwent revision surgery: ten (22%) in the polyethylene group and 16 (70%) in the metal-backed group (p < 0.0001). At 12 years’ follow-up, the rate of implant survival was 74% (sd 0.09) for polyethylene components and 24% (sd 0.10) for metal-backed components (p < 0.0002). Glenoid loosening or failure was the indication for revision in the polyethylene group, whereas polyethylene wear with metal-on-metal contact, instability, and insufficiency of the rotator cuff were the indications for revision in the metal-backed group. Preoperative posterior subluxation of the humeral head with a biconcave/retroverted glenoid (Walch B2) had an adverse effect on the survival of a metal-backed component.
Conclusion: The survival of a cemented polyethylene glenoid component is three times higher than that of a cementless metal-backed glenoid component ten years after aTSA in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Patients with a biconcave (B2) glenoid have the highest risk of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:485-92.
Background: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements of glenoid version and inclination are recommended for planning glenoid implantation in shoulder arthroplasty. However, current manual or semi-automated 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) methods are user-dependent and time-consuming. We assessed whether the use of a 3D automated method is accurate and reliable to measure glenoid version and inclination in osteoarthritic shoulders.
Methods: CT scans of osteoarthritic shoulders of 60 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty were obtained. Automated, surgeon-operated, image analysis software (Glenosys; Imascap) was developed to measure glenoid version and inclination. The anatomic scapular reference planes were defined as the mean of the peripheral points of the scapular body as well as the plane perpendicular to it, passing along the supraspinatus fossa line. Measurements were compared with those obtained using previously described manual or semi-automated methods, including the Friedman version angle on 2D CTs, Friedman method on 3D multiplanar reconstructions (corrected Friedman method), Ganapathi-Iannotti and Lewis-Armstrong methods on 3D volumetric reconstructions (for glenoid version), and Maurer method (for glenoid inclination).The mean differences (and standard deviation) and the concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated. Two orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the images for the interobserver analysis, with one of them measuring them twice more for the intraobserver analysis; interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results: The mean difference in the Glenosys glenoid version measurement was 2.0° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.93) compared with the Friedman method, 2.5° ± 3.2° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the corrected Friedman method, 1.5° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.94) compared with the Ganapathi-Iannotti method, and 1.8° ± 3.8° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the Lewis-Armstrong method. There was a mean difference of 0.2° ± 4.7° (CCC = 0.78) between the inclination measurements made with the Glenosys and Maurer methods. The difference between the overall average 2D and 3D measurements was not significant (p = 0.45).
Conclusions: Use of fully automated software for 3D measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders is reliable and accurate, showing excellent correlation with previously described manual or semi-automated methods.
Clinical relevance: The use of automated surgeon-operated image analysis software to evaluate 3D glenoid anatomy eliminates interobserver and intraobserver discrepancies, improves the accuracy of preoperative planning for shoulder replacement, and offers a potential gain of time for the surgeon.
Close
Publications 2017 du Dr GAUCI Marc-Olivier
Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion
Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion
Background: Glenoid deficiency and erosion (excessive retroversion/inclination) must be corrected in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to avoid prosthetic notching or instability and to maximize function, range of motion, and prosthesis longevity. This study reports the results of RSA with an angled, autologous glenoid graft harvested from the humerus (angled BIO-RSA).
Methods: A trapezoidal bone graft, harvested from the humeral head and fixed with a long-post baseplate and screws, was used to compensate for residual glenoid bone loss/erosion. For simple to moderate (<25°) glenoid defects, standardized instrumentation combined with some eccentric reaming (<15°) was used to reconstruct the glenoid and obtain neutral implant alignment. For severe (>25°) and complex (multiplanar) glenoid bone defects, patient-specific grafts and guides were used after 3-dimensional planning. Patients were reviewed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-81 months). Preoperative and postoperative measurements of inclination and version were performed in the plane of the scapula on computed tomography images.
Results: The study included 54 patients (41 women, 13 men; mean 73 years old). Fifteen patients had combined vertical and horizontal glenoid bone deficiency. Among E2/E3 glenoids, inclination improved from 37° (range, 14° to 84°) to 10.2° (range -28° to 36°, P < .001). Among B2/C glenoids, retroversion improved from -21° (range, -49° to 0°) to -10.6° (-32° to 4°, P = .06). Complete radiographic incorporation of the graft occurred in 94% (51 of 54). Complications included infection in 1 and clinical aseptic baseplate loosening in 2. Mild notching occurred in 25% (13 of 51) of patients. Constant-Murley and Subjective Shoulder Value assessments increased from 31 to 68 and from 30% to 83%, respectively (P < .001).
Conclusion: Angled BIO-RSA predictably corrects glenoid deficiency, including severe (>25°) multiplanar deformity. Graft incorporation is predictable. Advantages of using an autograftharvested in situ include bone stock augmentation, lateralization, low donor-site morbidity, low relative cost, and flexibility needed to simultaneously correct posterior and superior glenoid defects.
Background: Posterior humeral subluxation is the main cause of failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. We aimed to compare humeral head subluxation in various reference planes and to search for a correlation with retroversion, inclination, and glenoid wear.
Materials and methods: We included 109 computed tomography scans of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and 97 of shoulder problems unrelated to shoulder osteoarthritis (controls); all computed tomography scans were reconstructed in the anatomic scapular plane and the glenoid hull plane that we defined. In both planes, we measured retroversion, inclination, glenohumeral offset (Walch index), and scapulohumeral offset.
Results: Retroversion in the scapular plane (Friedman method) was lower than that in the glenoid hull plane for controls and for arthritic shoulders. The threshold of scapulohumeral subluxation was 60% and 65% in the scapular plane and glenoid hull plane, respectively. The mean upward inclination was lower in the scapular plane (Churchill method) than in the glenoid hull plane (Maurer method). In the glenoid hull plane, 35% of type A2 glenoids showed glenohumeral offset greater than 75%, with mean retroversion of 25.6° ± 6° as compared with 7.5° ± 7.2° for the « centered » type A2 glenoids (P < .0001) and an upward inclination of -1.4° ± 8° and 6.3° ± 7° (P = .03), respectively. The correlation between retroversion and scapulohumeral offset was r = 0.64 in the glenoid hull plane and r = 0.59 in the scapular plane (P < .05).
Conclusion: Measurement in the glenoid hull plane may be more accurate than in the scapular plane. Thus, the glenoid hull method allows for better understanding type B3 of the modified Walch classification.
Background: The concept of free interposition arthroplasty proved successful for small joints of the hand, wrist, and foot, particularly after the use of implants coated with pyrocarbon, which enhanced their tribologic and elastic properties. The present study reports preliminary outcomes of a pyrocarbon-coated interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) implant.
Methods: This was a prospective study of 67 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder PISA at 9 centers. The mean age at surgery was 51 years, with only 12 patients older than 60 years. The indications for surgery were primary glenohumeral arthritis in 42, avascular necrosis in 13, and secondary arthritis in 12 patients.
Results: Revision surgery was performed in 7 patients (10.4%), 2 (3.0%) were lost to follow-up, and the outcome assessments were incomplete in 3 (4.4%). This left 55 patients, aged 49.3 ± 12.0 years, with complete outcomes assessments at a mean follow-up of 26.8 ± 3.4 months. The Constant score improved from 34.1 ± 15.1 preoperatively to 66.1 ± 19.7 postoperatively. The radiographic findings revealed erosion in 6 glenoids and thinning of 3 humeral tuberosities.
Conclusion: In a cohort of young arthritic patients, PISA renders clinical scores and implant survival comparable to those of hemishoulder arthroplasty but remain inferior to those results reported for total shoulder arthroplasty. The study enabled identification of contraindications and potential causes of failure that wererelated to the concept of free interposition and smaller radius of curvature of the sphere. Until long-term results are available, this type of innovative implant should remain to be tested in a few specialized shoulder centers.
Background: The type B3 glenoid is an addition to the Walch classification. A potential etiologic theory is that it is a progression of the B2. It is characterized by uniconcavity, absent paleoglenoid, medialization, retroversion, and subluxation. The purpose of this study was to describe the morphology of B3 glenoids.
Methods: Fifty-two patients with B3 glenoids underwent 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography data. Glenoid measurements (retroversion, inclination, medialization) and humeral head subluxation according to the scapular and glenoid planes were determined. The measured variables were compared between male and female patients.
Results: The mean B3 retroversion, inclination, and medialization were 24° ± 7°, 8° ± 6° superior, and 14 ± 4 mm, respectively. The mean posterior subluxation was 80% ± 8% and 54% ± 6% according to the scapular and glenoid planes, respectively. There were no differences in B3 characteristics between sexes (P > .05). A significant correlation existed between glenoid retroversion and humeral head subluxation relative to the scapular plane, with every 1° increase in retroversion translating to a 1% increase in subluxation (P < .001). In contrast, when referencing the glenoid plane, the humeral head remained concentric to the erosion.
Conclusions: The B3 is uniconcave and retroverted. As glenoid retroversion increases, posterior humeral head subluxation significantly increases as referenced to the scapular plane; however, when referenced to the glenoid plane, the head remains concentric to the erosion. This appearance of « concentricity » is acquired secondary to the wear pattern, creating a uniconcave glenoid. Therefore, surgeons should be aware that the visualized concentricity is a product of the erosion pattern and thus may conceal a greater amount of subluxation potential.
Adaptive carpal malalignment is the consequence of malunion of the distal radius. Since the radial metaphysis and capitate have to be aligned, any disorientation of the radial epiphysis will force the proximal carpal row to adapt, as it is the only mobile element. There are two types of adaptation depending where the compensative occurs: (1) midcarpal – leading to flexion between the lunate and capitate, with the lunate maintaining a normal relationship with the radial epiphysis axis; (2) radiocarpal – combining flexion and dorsal displacement of the lunate relative to the axis of the radial epiphysis, with the midcarpal joint remaining aligned. Clinically, adaptive carpal malalignment is not the first reason for consultation in cases of distal radius malunion. It occurs in cases of moderate deformity with preserved pronation-supination in a young patient who has good mobility. It generates dorsal pain that may be associated with a snapping sensation. The diagnosis requires strict lateral X-ray views. Over time, the wrist becomes stiff but analgesic and is often well tolerated functionally. This type of deformity has not been shown to lead to osteoarthritis. Osteotomy to correct the malunion is the only way to treat adaptive carpal malalignment in active young patients who have a mobile but painful wrist.
Keywords: Cal vicieux; Carpal malalignment; Distal radial fracture; Désaxation du carpe; Fracture du radius distal; Malunion.
Background: The concept of free interposition arthroplasty proved successful for small joints of the hand, wrist, and foot, particularly after the use of implants coated with pyrocarbon, which enhanced their tribologic and elastic properties. The present study reports preliminary outcomes of a pyrocarbon-coated interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) implant.
Methods: This was a prospective study of 67 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder PISA at 9 centers. The mean age at surgery was 51 years, with only 12 patients older than 60 years. The indications for surgery were primary glenohumeral arthritis in 42, avascular necrosis in 13, and secondary arthritis in 12 patients.
Results: Revision surgery was performed in 7 patients (10.4%), 2 (3.0%) were lost to follow-up, and the outcome assessments were incomplete in 3 (4.4%). This left 55 patients, aged 49.3 ± 12.0 years, with complete outcomes assessments at a mean follow-up of 26.8 ± 3.4 months. The Constant score improved from 34.1 ± 15.1 preoperatively to 66.1 ± 19.7 postoperatively. The radiographic findings revealed erosion in 6 glenoids and thinning of 3 humeral tuberosities.
Conclusion: In a cohort of young arthritic patients, PISA renders clinical scores and implant survival comparable to those of hemishoulder arthroplasty but remain inferior to those results reported for total shoulder arthroplasty. The study enabled identification of contraindications and potential causes of failure that wererelated to the concept of free interposition and smaller radius of curvature of the sphere. Until long-term results are available, this type of innovative implant should remain to be tested in a few specialized shoulder centers. Keywords: Glenohumeral arthritis; interposition arthroplasty; osteoarthritis; pyrocarbon; pyrolytic carbon; shoulder arthroplasty.
M-O Gauci, H Lenoir, T Waitzenegger, J Andrin, C Lazerges, B Coulet, M Chammas
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27890211/
Abstract
Extra-articular distal radius fractures in young active patients are typically the result of sport injuries or traffic accidents. Displaced fractures are less well tolerated in young patients than in older people, especially in terms of dorsal tilt and radial shortening. Non-surgical treatment is only indicated when the fracture is minimally or not displaced. No fracture fixation method is superior to another, however, the treatment goal is a rapid return to previous activities.
Aims: Patient-specific glenoid guides (PSGs) claim an improvement in accuracy and reproducibility of the positioning of components in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The results have not yet been confirmed in a prospective clinical trial. Our aim was to assess whether the use of PSGs in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder would allow accurate and reliable implantation of the glenoid component.
Patients and methods: A total of 17 patients (three men and 14 women) with a mean age of 71 years (53 to 81) awaiting TSA were enrolled in the study. Pre- and post-operative version and inclination of the glenoid were measured on CT scans, using 3D planning automatic software. During surgery, a congruent 3D-printed PSG was applied onto the glenoid surface, thus determining the entry point and orientation of the central guide wire used for reaming the glenoid and the introduction of the component. Manual segmentation was performed on post-operative CT scans to compare the planned and the actual position of the entry point (mm) and orientation of the component (°).
Results: The mean error in the accuracy of the entry point was -0.1 mm (standard deviation (sd) 1.4) in the horizontal plane, and 0.8 mm (sd 1.3) in the vertical plane. The mean error in the orientation of the glenoid component was 3.4° (sd 5.1°) for version and 1.8° (sd 5.3°) for inclination.
Conclusion: Pre-operative planning with automatic software and the use of PSGs provides accurate and reproducible positioning and orientation of the glenoid component in anatomical TSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1080-5.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Patient specific guides; Three-dimensional; Total shoulder arthroplasty and Glenoid component; Validation.
Background: Since Walch and colleagues originally classified glenoid morphology in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, several authors have reported varying levels of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. We propose several modifications to the Walch classification that we hypothesize will increase interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Methods: We propose the addition of the B3 and D glenoids and a more precise definition of the A2 glenoid. The B3 glenoid is monoconcave and worn preferentially in its posterior aspect, leading to pathologic retroversion of at least 15° or subluxation of 70%, or both. The D glenoid is defined by glenoid anteversion or anterior humeral head subluxation. The A2 glenoid has a line connecting the anterior and posterior native glenoid rims that transects the humeral head. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography glenoid reconstructions, 3 evaluators used the original Walch classification and the modified Walch classification to classify 129 nonconsecutive glenoids on 4 separate occasions. Reliabilities were assessed by calculating κ coefficients.
Results: Interobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.391 (indicating fair agreement) using the original classification to an average of 0.703 (substantial agreement) using the modified classification. Intraobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.605 (moderate agreement) to an average of 0.882 (nearly perfect agreement).
Conclusion: When 3-dimensional glenoid reconstructions and the modified Walch classification described herein are used, improved interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities are obtained.
Background: The β-angle, formed by the intersection of a line on the floor of the supraspinatus fossa and glenoid fossa line, has been described as a reliable measurement tool in the clinical setting to analyze glenoid inclination on the anteroposterior (AP) view of the shoulder. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the β-angle measurement using different imaging modalities with a validated 3-dimensional (3D) software tool.
Materials and methods: The β-angle was measured on AP radiographs, unformatted 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scan, and reformatted 2D CT scan in the scapular plane for 51 shoulders of 49 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Comparison to the glenoid inclination angle calculated by the 3D software was performed.
Results: The β-angle measured on reformatted CT scan was found to be the most accurate measurement method, with a mean difference of 1° (standard deviation [SD], 0.5°) with respect to 3D measurement. On AP radiographs, the β-angle was not as accurate, with a mean difference of 3° (SD, 0.7°; P < .006). The β-angle on unformatted 2D CT scan was not a reliable method to measure glenoid inclination, with a mean difference of 10° (SD, 0.9°; P < .0001).
Conclusion: The β-angle measured with 2D CT scan formatted in the scapular plane was the most accurate method for measuring glenoid inclination. The β-angle on the AP radiograph is less accurate and reliable. Measurement of the β-angle on an unformatted 2D CT scan is not an acceptable method to determine glenoid inclination.
Keywords: 3D software; CT scan; Glenoid inclination; measurement method; β-angle.
Background: The modular pyrocarbon (MoPyC) radial head prosthesis (Tornier, Saint-Ismier, France) is a monoblock modular radial head prosthesis. This study assessed midterm outcomes after implantation of the prosthesis.
Materials: A retrospective study was conducted of a consecutive cohort of 65 patients who underwent radial head replacement with the MoPyC prosthesis from January 2006 to April 2013. Indications were fractures, early or late failures from orthopedic or fixation treatments, and revisions after another implant. Patients were observed for >2 years for range of motion, pain, and stability; function by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (total score, 100) and grip strength were assessed. Quality of stem implantation, bone resorption around the neck, and periprosthetic lucency were noted and quantified on radiographs. Capitellum shape and density as well as humeroulnar aspect (river delta sign) were evaluated. Complications and revision procedures were noted.
Results: We evaluated 52 of 65 patients (mean follow-up, 46 ± 20 months; range, 24-108). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 96 ± 7; pain score, 42 ± 7/45; and motion score, 18 ± 2/20. Function and stability were excellent. Radiology revealed 92% of patients with cortical resorption around the neck without mechanical failure. Bone resorption was mostly anterior and lateral; it resolved within the first year and thereafter was stable. Eight patients underwent revision surgery for stiffness. No implant failures were noted.
Conclusion: Results of the MoPyC radial head prosthesis appear to be satisfactory. Bone resorption around the neck (stress shielding) is frequent and stable after 1 year and does not impair stem fixation. The MoPyC prosthesis appears to be a reliable solution for replacing the radial head.
Background: Increased critical shoulder angles consist of both the acromial cover and glenoid inclination and have been found in patients with rotator cuff pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation of the critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination and to determine the difference in glenoid inclination between patients with osteoarthritis and massive rotator cuff tears.
Methods: The critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination were measured on anteroposterior radiographs, and glenoid inclination was also measured on a validated 3-dimensional computer software program of 50 shoulders undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-five shoulders had osteoarthritis and A1 glenoids, as defined by the Walch classification, and were undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The other 25 shoulders had massive rotator cuff tears and E0 glenoids, as defined by the Favard classification. The 2 groups were compared.
Results: Critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination were significantly correlated (R(2) = 0.7426, P < .001). Shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears (E0) demonstrated increased glenoid inclination measurements than shoulders with osteoarthritis (A1). As measured by the 3-dimensional software, the massive rotator cuff group had a glenoid inclination of 13.6° ± 4.3° and the osteoarthritis group had a glenoid inclination of 4.7° ± 5.6°. When measured by anteroposterior radiographs, the average glenoid inclination was 13.6° ± 4.6° in the massive rotator cuff group and was 7.6° ± 5.01° in the osteoarthritic group .
Conclusion: Glenoid inclination is linearly correlated with the critical shoulder angle and is significantly increased in patients with massive rotator cuff tears.
Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common compressive neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. The accessory anconeus epitrochlearis muscle – present in 4% to 34% of the general population – is a known, but rare cause of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The aim of this article was to expand our knowledge about this condition based on six cases that we encountered at our hospital between 2011 and 2015. Every patient had a typical clinical presentation: hypoesthesia or sensory deficit in the fourth and fifth fingers; potential intrinsics atrophy of the fourth intermetacarpal space; loss of strength and difficulty with fifth finger abduction. Although it can be useful to have the patient undergo ultrasonography or MRI to aid in the diagnosis, only electromyography (EMG) was performed in our patients. EMG revealed clear compression in the ulnar groove, with conduction block and a large drop in nerve conduction velocity. Treatment typically consists of conservative treatment first (splint, analgesics). Surgical treatment should be considered when conservative treatment has failed or the patient presents severe neurological deficits. In all of our patients, the ulnar nerve was surgically released but not transposed. Five of the six patients had completely recovered after 0.5 to 4years follow-up. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow by the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is not common, but it must not be ignored. Only ultrasonography, MRI or, preferably, surgical exploration can establish the diagnosis. EMG findings such as reduced motor nerve conduction velocity in a short segment of the ulnar nerve provides evidence of anconeus epitrochlearis-induced neuropathy.
Purpose: To evaluate subjective and objective results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) combined with transfer of latissimus dorsi and teres major tendons (modified L’Episcopo transfer) in a large cohort and determine if postoperative improvements were maintained over time.
Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients were presented to our clinic with a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (CLEER) and were treated with a combined RSA and modified L’Episcopo transfer. Patients were prospectively followed on a yearly basis. Clinical evaluation and radiographic evaluation were obtained in all patients at each visit. Two patients were unable to return for follow-up, and 1 patient died. Follow-up averaged 44 months (range: 12–111). Thirty-six patients were presented with cuff tear arthropathy, 9 with a failed rotator cuff repair, 5 with a massive rotator cuff tear, 4 with a failed arthroplasty, and 2 with fracture sequelae.
Results: Two patients sustained traumatic tears of the transfer (1 following prosthetic instability and 1 following a periprosthetic fracture) and were excluded from the functional analysis. Combined with the three patients lost to follow-up, this left 54 total patients. Age at surgery was 70 years (range: 52–84). SSV was significantly improved from 29 % preoperatively to 72 % postoperatively. Forward flexion improved by an average of 53° and external rotation improved by 28° (−30–70°). The ADLER and adjusted Constant scores improved from 9 preoperatively to 25 postoperatively and from 44 % preoperatively to 88 % postoperatively, respectively, at most recent follow-up. Improvements were maintained over long-term follow-up. Forty-nine patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their surgical result, and 5 patients were disappointed.
Conclusion: Combined RSA with modified L’Episcopo transfer is an effective procedure for restoring forward elevation and external rotation in patients presenting with a combined deficit. Subjective and objective improvements are realized soon after surgery and are maintained with time.
